181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31376413)
1. Using a structured-light 3D scanner to improve EEG source modeling with more accurate electrode positions.
Homölle S; Oostenveld R
J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Oct; 326():108378. PubMed ID: 31376413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning.
Taberna GA; Marino M; Ganzetti M; Mantini D
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026020. PubMed ID: 30634182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Algorithmic localization of high-density EEG electrode positions using motion capture.
Hirth LN; Stanley CJ; Damiano DL; Bulea TC
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Dec; 346():108919. PubMed ID: 32853593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EEG electrode localization with 3D iPhone scanning using point-cloud electrode selection (PC-ES).
Everitt A; Richards H; Song Y; Smith J; Kobylarz E; Lukovits T; Halter R; Murphy E
J Neural Eng; 2023 Dec; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 38055968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG electrode digitization with commercial virtual reality hardware.
Cline CC; Coogan C; He B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207516. PubMed ID: 30462691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Algorithm to find high density EEG scalp coordinates and analysis of their correspondence to structural and functional regions of the brain.
Giacometti P; Perdue KL; Diamond SG
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():84-96. PubMed ID: 24769168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More Reliable EEG Electrode Digitizing Methods Can Reduce Source Estimation Uncertainty, but Current Methods Already Accurately Identify Brodmann Areas.
Shirazi SY; Huang HJ
Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1159. PubMed ID: 31787866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic localization of EEG electrode markers within 3D MR data.
Sijbers J; Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Boon P; Verhoye M; Van der Linden A; Van Dyck D
Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 May; 18(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 10788727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Localization of deep brain activity with scalp and subdural EEG.
Fahimi Hnazaee M; Wittevrongel B; Khachatryan E; Libert A; Carrette E; Dauwe I; Meurs A; Boon P; Van Roost D; Van Hulle MM
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117344. PubMed ID: 32898677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validating Non-invasive EEG Source Imaging Using Optimal Electrode Configurations on a Representative Rat Head Model.
Valdés-Hernández PA; Bae J; Song Y; Sumiyoshi A; Aubert-Vázquez E; Riera JJ
Brain Topogr; 2019 Jul; 32(4):599-624. PubMed ID: 27026168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A semi-automatic method to determine electrode positions and labels from gel artifacts in EEG/fMRI-studies.
de Munck JC; van Houdt PJ; Verdaasdonk RM; Ossenblok PP
Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):399-403. PubMed ID: 21784161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of polymer sensitive MRI sequence to localization of EEG electrodes.
Butler R; Gilbert G; Descoteaux M; Bernier PM; Whittingstall K
J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Feb; 278():36-45. PubMed ID: 28017737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of EEG Source Localization Using Simplified and Anatomically Accurate Head Models in Younger and Older Adults.
Liu C; Downey RJ; Mu Y; Richer N; Hwang J; Shah VA; Sato SD; Clark DJ; Hass CJ; Manini TM; Seidler RD; Ferris DP
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():2591-2602. PubMed ID: 37252873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Co-registration of EEG and MRI data using matching of spline interpolated and MRI-segmented reconstructions of the scalp surface.
Lamm C; Windischberger C; Leodolter U; Moser E; Bauer H
Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 11797814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated methodology for optimal selection of minimum electrode subsets for accurate EEG source estimation based on Genetic Algorithm optimization.
Soler A; Moctezuma LA; Giraldo E; Molinas M
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11221. PubMed ID: 35780173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated detection and labeling of high-density EEG electrodes from structural MR images.
Marino M; Liu Q; Brem S; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056003. PubMed ID: 27484621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
Wang Y; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geodesic photogrammetry for localizing sensor positions in dense-array EEG.
Russell GS; Jeffrey Eriksen K; Poolman P; Luu P; Tucker DM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1130-40. PubMed ID: 15826854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A rapid method for determining standard 10/10 electrode positions for high resolution EEG studies.
Le J; Lu M; Pellouchoud E; Gevins A
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jun; 106(6):554-8. PubMed ID: 9741756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
