124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3137760)
21. PEP: an explanation of the JCAH's performance and evaluation procedure for auditing and improving patient care.
Jacobs CM; Christoffel T
Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1975; 8(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10289157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality assurance in 1984.
Komaroff AL
Med Care; 1985 May; 23(5):723-34. PubMed ID: 4040196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Qualidigm evaluates Medicaid managed care health plan performance.
Bell J; Casey B; Waite B
Conn Med; 1999 Jun; 63(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 10432768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Assuring quality of health care. An overview.
Demlo LK
Eval Health Prof; 1983 Jun; 6(2):161-96. PubMed ID: 10299257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The difficulty of quality evaluation.
Talso P
Internist; 1982 Mar; 23(2):13, 16. PubMed ID: 10257496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward effective quality assurance: the evolution and current status of the JCAH QA standard.
Roberts JS; Walczak RM
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Jan; 10(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 6422378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality assurance monitoring in psychiatry.
Fauman MA
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Sep; 146(9):1121-30. PubMed ID: 2669534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sounding board. Quality assessment and quality assurance: the performance-review alternative.
Farrington JF; Felch WC; Hare RL
N Engl J Med; 1980 Jul; 303(3):154-6. PubMed ID: 7189823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Evaluation of quality of care in the United States].
Durand-Zaleski I; Audet AM; Greenfield S; Jolly D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1991; 39(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 1775700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Winning with medical review.
Beaird L
Tex Med; 1987 Nov; 83(11):44-7. PubMed ID: 3424229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Targeting ambulatory care cases for risk management and quality management.
Macnee CL; Penchansky R
Inquiry; 1994; 31(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 8168910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measurement of the process of care. Experiences from The Netherlands and Canada.
Steven ID
Aust Fam Physician; 1990 Mar; 19(3):283-5. PubMed ID: 2334338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Annual administrative reviews. Patient care evaluation.
Mansfield EO
Hospitals; 1974 Apr; 48(7):163-6. PubMed ID: 4856094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Is high-quality care assessable?
McKillop W
Hospitals; 1975 Jan; 49(2):43-7. PubMed ID: 1167326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The quality assurance program at Memorial Hospital. Professional standards review organizations (PSRO) and quality care for the cancer patient.
Dunphey GJ; Scheiner E; Catlin D
Clin Bull; 1974; 4(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 4857253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Private review-its impact on health care and physicians.
Sandrick KM
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 6806740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The state of the art of quality assessment--1973.
Lewis CE
Med Care; 1974 Oct; 12(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 4474575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. From "medical audit" and "UR" to effective use of patient care data.
Thompson RE
IMJ Ill Med J; 1980 Jul; 158(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 6105143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Aspects of audit. 1. The background.
Shaw CD
Br Med J; 1980 May; 280(6226):1256-8. PubMed ID: 7388496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Trauma audit and quality improvement.
McDermott FT
Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Mar; 64(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 8117190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
