354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31377697)
61. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Human papilloma virus testing in patient follow-up post cone biopsy due to high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Almog B; Gamzu R; Kuperminc MJ; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Mar; 88(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 12648585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coin-shaped" conization.
Kim M; Ishioka S; Endo T; Baba T; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 293(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 26305031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ruano Y; Torrents M; Ferrer FJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26189247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Loop diathermy or laser excisional conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Vejerslev LO; Schouenborg L; Sørensen F; Nielsen D; Sørensen SS; Juhl BR; Rygaard C; Junge J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 10577621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Long-term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study.
Fernández-Montolí ME; Tous S; Medina G; Castellarnau M; García-Tejedor A; de Sanjosé S
BJOG; 2020 Feb; 127(3):377-387. PubMed ID: 31631477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Surgical resection, radiotherapy and percutaneous thermal ablation for treatment of stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chockalingam A; Konstantinidis M; Koo B; Moon JT; Tran A; Nourouzpour S; Lawson E; Fox K; Habibollahi P; Odisio B; Loya M; Bassir A; Nezami N
BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e057638. PubMed ID: 35710245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Martin-Hirsch PP; Bryant A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2013(12):CD001421. PubMed ID: 24302533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16394037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Management of cervical premalignant lesions.
Lindeque BG
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):545-61. PubMed ID: 16150393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Residual and recurrent disease after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Lie AK; Isaksen C
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 9277657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
