355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31377697)
81. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Role of human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Huang HJ; Tung HJ; Yang LY; Chao A; Tang YH; Chou HH; Chang WY; Wu RC; Huang CC; Lin CY; Liao MJ; Chen WC; Lin CT; Chen MY; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Chang TC; Lai CH
Int J Cancer; 2021 Feb; 148(3):665-672. PubMed ID: 32781482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix: 110 cases treated by cold-knife conization.
Margariti PA; Balsamo G; Gullotta G; Rabitti C; Valle D; Mancuso S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 9641225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.
Fan A; Wang C; Han C; Wang Y; Xue F; Zhang L
J Med Virol; 2018 Sep; 90(9):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 29704442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Pre- and post-conization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for CIN 2-3.
Alonso I; Torné A; Puig-Tintoré LM; Esteve R; Quinto L; Campo E; Pahisa J; Ordi J
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):631-6. PubMed ID: 16780934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. CO2 laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II-III: complications and efficacy.
Hagen B; Skjeldestad FE; Bratt H; Tingulstad S; Lie AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 May; 77(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 9654180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Factors affecting outcome after incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Paraskevaidis E; Kalantaridou SN; Paschopoulos M; Zikopoulos K; Diakomanolis E; Dalkalitsis N; Makrydimas G; Pappa L; Malamou-Mitsi V; Agnantis NJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 14658599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. [Factors of recurrence of intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix].
Pires MA; Dias M; Oliveira C; De Oliveira HM
Acta Med Port; 2000; 13(5-6):259-63. PubMed ID: 11234489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. The relationship of human papillomavirus infection with endocervical glandular involvement on cone specimens in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Spinillo A; Dominoni M; Boschi AC; Cesari S; Fiandrino G; Gardella B
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):630-635. PubMed ID: 33041069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbon dioxide laser.
Békássy Z
Lasers Surg Med; 1997; 20(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 9142687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization does not require immediate excisional procedure.
Campaner AB; Cardoso FA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):517-9. PubMed ID: 21340686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
97. Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review.
Jakus S; Edmonds P; Dunton C; King SA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2000 Aug; 55(8):520-7. PubMed ID: 10945195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Efficacy and Long-term Outcomes of Repeated Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone of the Cervix.
van de Sande AJM; Schreuder CM; van Baars R; Koeneman MM; Gerestein CG; Kruse AJ; van Kemenade FJ; Willemsen SP; van Beekhuizen HJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 139(3):417-422. PubMed ID: 35115479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of ablative versus excisional procedure in the treatment of histologically confirmed CIN2/3: A systematic review.
Zhang L; Sauvaget C; Mosquera I; Basu P
BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):153-161. PubMed ID: 35689493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Kyrgiou M; Simoens C; Raifu AO; Koliopoulos G; Martin-Hirsch P; Prendiville W; Paraskevaidis E
BMJ; 2008 Sep; 337():a1284. PubMed ID: 18801868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
