BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31378649)

  • 1. Production of non-mosaic genome edited porcine embryos by injection of CRISPR/Cas9 into germinal vesicle oocytes.
    Su X; Chen W; Cai Q; Liang P; Chen Y; Cong P; Huang J
    J Genet Genomics; 2019 Jul; 46(7):335-342. PubMed ID: 31378649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective generation of maternal genome point mutated porcine embryos by injection of cytosine base editor into germinal vesicle oocytes.
    Su X; Chen W; Cai Q; Liang P; Chen Y; Cong P; Huang J
    Sci China Life Sci; 2020 Jul; 63(7):996-1005. PubMed ID: 31974864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
    Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; LE QA; Hirano T; Otoi T
    J Reprod Dev; 2019 Jun; 65(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 30726783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome Editing in Pigs.
    Preisinger D; Winogrodzki T; Klinger B; Schnieke A; Rieblinger B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2631():393-417. PubMed ID: 36995680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TEAD4 regulates trophectoderm differentiation upstream of CDX2 in a GATA3-independent manner in the human preimplantation embryo.
    Stamatiadis P; Cosemans G; Boel A; Menten B; De Sutter P; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Lluis F; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1760-1773. PubMed ID: 35700449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.
    Sato M; Kosuke M; Koriyama M; Inada E; Saitoh I; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Miyoshi K
    Theriogenology; 2018 Mar; 108():29-38. PubMed ID: 29195121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oocyte electroporation prior to in vitro fertilization is an efficient method to generate single, double, and multiple knockout porcine embryos of interest in biomedicine and animal production.
    Navarro-Serna S; Piñeiro-Silva C; Fernández-Martín I; Dehesa-Etxebeste M; López de Munain A; Gadea J
    Theriogenology; 2024 Apr; 218():111-118. PubMed ID: 38320372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Followed by CRIPSR/Cas9 Microinjection Results in Highly Efficient Genome Editing in Cloned Pigs.
    Sheets TP; Park CH; Park KE; Powell A; Donovan DM; Telugu BP
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 27918485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.
    Whitworth KM; Lee K; Benne JA; Beaton BP; Spate LD; Murphy SL; Samuel MS; Mao J; O'Gorman C; Walters EM; Murphy CN; Driver J; Mileham A; McLaren D; Wells KD; Prather RS
    Biol Reprod; 2014 Sep; 91(3):78. PubMed ID: 25100712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electroporation of Cas9 protein/sgRNA into early pronuclear zygotes generates non-mosaic mutants in the mouse.
    Hashimoto M; Yamashita Y; Takemoto T
    Dev Biol; 2016 Oct; 418(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27474397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental competence of porcine genome-edited zygotes.
    Gil MA; Martinez CA; Nohalez A; Parrilla I; Roca J; Wu J; Ross PJ; Cuello C; Izpisua JC; Martinez EA
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2017 Sep; 84(9):814-821. PubMed ID: 28471514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
    Li Y; Adur MK; Wang W; Schultz RB; Hale B; Wierson W; Charley SE; McGrail M; Essner J; Tuggle CK; Ross JW
    Theriogenology; 2021 Aug; 170():107-116. PubMed ID: 34004455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A non-inheritable maternal Cas9-based multiple-gene editing system in mice.
    Sakurai T; Kamiyoshi A; Kawate H; Mori C; Watanabe S; Tanaka M; Uetake R; Sato M; Shindo T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():20011. PubMed ID: 26817415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effects of introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system by microinjection and electroporation into porcine embryos at different stages.
    Le QA; Tanihara F; Wittayarat M; Namula Z; Sato Y; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Hirata M; Otoi T
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Jan; 14(1):7. PubMed ID: 33407863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection in oocytes disables pancreas development in sheep.
    Vilarino M; Rashid ST; Suchy FP; McNabb BR; van der Meulen T; Fine EJ; Ahsan SD; Mursaliyev N; Sebastiano V; Diab SS; Huising MO; Nakauchi H; Ross PJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17472. PubMed ID: 29234093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient production of biallelic GGTA1 knockout pigs by cytoplasmic microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 into zygotes.
    Petersen B; Frenzel A; Lucas-Hahn A; Herrmann D; Hassel P; Klein S; Ziegler M; Hadeler KG; Niemann H
    Xenotransplantation; 2016 Sep; 23(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 27610605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient generation of GGTA1-deficient pigs by electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into in vitro-fertilized zygotes.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Sawamoto O; Kikuchi T; Doi M; Otoi T
    BMC Biotechnol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 32811500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation.
    Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Hirano T; Takemoto T; Nakai M; Fuchimoto DI; Otoi T
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Jan; 90(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30368976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
    Mehravar M; Shirazi A; Nazari M; Banan M
    Dev Biol; 2019 Jan; 445(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 30359560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.