BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31379202)

  • 1. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):63-94. PubMed ID: 32718198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
    Palla IA; Singson M
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.
    Shaw D; Satalkar P
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.
    Godecharle S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1421-1436. PubMed ID: 28913604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.
    Yu L; Miao M; Liu W; Zhang B; Zhang P
    Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):95-114. PubMed ID: 32783533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 32487190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions.
    Olesen A; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Sep; 18(3):271-278. PubMed ID: 30048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.
    Satalkar P; Shaw D
    Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India.
    Dhingra D; Mishra D
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 11(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 24727622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Witnesses to research wrongdoing.
    Sieber JE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):3-14. PubMed ID: 23324198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research].
    Barde F; Peiffer-Smadja N; de La Blanchardière A
    Rev Med Interne; 2020 May; 41(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 32107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.
    Gollogly L; Momen H
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():24-9. PubMed ID: 16924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Account Res; 2018; 25(3):125-141. PubMed ID: 29394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.