These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31380665)

  • 1. Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment.
    Haslam SA; Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ
    Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):809-822. PubMed ID: 31380665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).
    Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ; Haslam SA
    Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):406-407. PubMed ID: 32250145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.
    Le Texier T
    Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):823-839. PubMed ID: 31380664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identity leadership is manifested via integrative complexity: Comment on Haslam et al. (2019).
    Chan L; Zubrod A; Woodard SR; Conway LG
    Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):403-405. PubMed ID: 32250144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When prisoners take over the prison: a social psychology of resistance.
    Haslam SA; Reicher SD
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2012 May; 16(2):154-79. PubMed ID: 21885855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contesting the "Nature" Of Conformity: what Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show.
    Haslam SA; Reicher SD
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(11):e1001426. PubMed ID: 23185132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?
    Carnahan T; McFarland S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 17440210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation.
    Bartels J
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 30961456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On rethinking the psychology of tyranny: the BBC prison study.
    Zimbardo PG
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 45(Pt 1):47-53. PubMed ID: 16573871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intergroup Leadership Across Distinct Subgroups and Identities.
    Rast DE; Hogg MA; van Knippenberg D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1090-1103. PubMed ID: 29528781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders.
    Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Awe and social conformity: Awe promotes the endorsement of social norms and conformity to the majority opinion.
    Prade C; Saroglou V
    Emotion; 2023 Oct; 23(7):2100-2104. PubMed ID: 36892869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On keeping your enemies close: powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats.
    Mead NL; Maner JK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):576-91. PubMed ID: 21988276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Team-oriented leadership: the interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification.
    Giessner SR; van Knippenberg D; van Ginkel W; Sleebos E
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jul; 98(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 23565892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared social identity in leadership.
    Reicher SD; Haslam SA; Platow MJ
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23():129-133. PubMed ID: 30237055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Happy to have been of service': the Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram's 'obedience' experiments.
    Haslam SA; Reicher SD; Millard K; McDonald R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):55-83. PubMed ID: 25196821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fewer but better: Proportionate size of the group affects evaluation of transgressive leaders.
    Travaglino GA; Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Yetkili O
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):318-36. PubMed ID: 26334165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making the leader identity salient can be demotivating.
    Savani K; Zou X
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 30024210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does social psychology persist over half a century? A direct replication of Cialdini et al.'s (1975) classic door-in-the-face technique.
    Genschow O; Westfal M; Crusius J; Bartosch L; Feikes KI; Pallasch N; Wozniak M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 33030935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups.
    Scholl A; Sassenberg K; Ellemers N; Scheepers D; de Wit F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):112-129. PubMed ID: 28983928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.