These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381178)

  • 1. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Different Surgical Guide Designs for Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
    Wu YT; Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; De Souza AB
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct; 48(5):351-357. PubMed ID: 34937081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Janner SFM; Schimmel M; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30589502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of the novel digital non-cross-arch surgical guides with integration of tooth undercut retention and screw-bone support for implant placement in mandibular free-end.
    Wu Q; Lou Y; Sun J; Xie C; Wu J; Yu H
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):550. PubMed ID: 38734597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
    Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implant macrodesign and insertion connection technology on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.
    El Kholy K; Ebenezer S; Wittneben JG; Lazarin R; Rousson D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31429184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study.
    Wang ZY; Chao JR; Zheng JW; You M; Liu Y; Shen JF
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103882. PubMed ID: 34742831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study.
    Derksen W; Wismeijer D; Flügge T; Hassan B; Tahmaseb A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 31330566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
    Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
    Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
    Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
    Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative retrospective study of different surgical guide designs for static computer-assisted implant surgery in posterior single edentulous sites.
    De Souza AB; Kang M; Negreiros WM; El-Rafie K; Finkelman M; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 34587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of alveolar ridge morphology and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two implant macro-designs: An in vitro study.
    Dulla FA; Couso-Queiruga E; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Raabe C
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104426. PubMed ID: 36652971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of drilling sequence and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in extraction sockets and healed sites-An in vitro investigation.
    Raabe C; Dulla FA; Yilmaz B; Chappuis V; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):320-329. PubMed ID: 36727584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.