BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381185)

  • 1. Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of collagen type II in osteochondral sections by comparing decalcification and antigen retrieval agent combinations.
    Amirtham SM; Ozbey O; Kachroo U; Ramasamy B; Vinod E
    Clin Anat; 2020 Apr; 33(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 31381185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
    Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparative analyses of decalcification procedures and methyl benzoate pre-treatment on tissue preservation and antigenicity in human acetabular labra.
    Pieroh P; Ehrlich A; Ghadban C; Litvak L; Steinke H; Josten C; Fakler JKM; Dehghani F
    Histol Histopathol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):899-908. PubMed ID: 30758043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue integrity, costs and time associated with different agents for histological bone preparation.
    Abrantes AA; Rafacho A; Rivero ER; Mariano FV; Siqueira FM; Gondak RO
    Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Apr; 80(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 28370969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
    Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
    Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
    Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the Effects of Various Decalcification Protocols on Immunohistochemical Staining in Zebrafish (
    Meritet DM; Spagnoli ST; Fischer KA; Löhr CV
    Zebrafish; 2019 Jun; 16(3):280-290. PubMed ID: 31017539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demineralized Murine Skeletal Histology.
    Mirando AJ; Hilton MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2230():283-302. PubMed ID: 33197020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.
    Miquelestorena-Standley E; Jourdan ML; Collin C; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Tallegas M; Brulin B; Le Nail LR; Tallet A; Le Loarer F; Massiere J; Galant C; de Pinieux G
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1505-1517. PubMed ID: 32094425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the immunohistochemistry benefits of boric acid antigen retrieval on rat decalcified joint tissues.
    Wilson E; Jackson S; Cruwys S; Kerry P
    J Immunol Methods; 2007 Apr; 322(1-2):137-42. PubMed ID: 17362980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of fixation and decalcification on the immunohistochemical localization of bone matrix proteins in fresh-frozen bone sections.
    Hosoya A; Hoshi K; Sahara N; Ninomiya T; Akahane S; Kawamoto T; Ozawa H
    Histochem Cell Biol; 2005 Jun; 123(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 15940506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of decalcification on immunoperoxidase staining.
    Mukai K; Yoshimura S; Anzai M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1986 Jun; 10(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 2424325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
    Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
    J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel approach to decalcification in histopathology laboratory: An adaptation from the Hammersmith protocol.
    Pradhan P; Rajesh NG; Badhe BA; Ilanchezian K; Manimehalai D; Jyothish A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2019; 62(3):423-429. PubMed ID: 31361231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-Step Preservation and Decalcification of Bony Tissue for Molecular Profiling.
    Mueller C; Harpole MG; Espina V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():85-102. PubMed ID: 28501995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Decalcification in formic acid after fixation in zinc-ethanol-formaldehyde does not preclude identification of neuronal and glial markers].
    Kolos EA; Korzhevskiĭ DE
    Morfologiia; 2013; 144(4):76-9. PubMed ID: 24592706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of different decalcification protocols on TUNEL and general cartilage staining.
    Emans PJ; Bulstra SK; Kuijer R
    Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):111-5. PubMed ID: 16298895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of two different tissue decalcification methods for immunohistochemistry].
    Du J; Liu JY; Su J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Apr; 43(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 21503129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
    Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
    Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.