These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381260)

  • 1. The role of systematic review and meta-analysis in modern cytopathology.
    Trimboli P; Treglia G; Giovanella L; Bongiovanni M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 31381260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review and meta-analysis as tools for evidence-based medicine.
    Iniesta-Sepúlveda M; Ríos A
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 102(6):336-337. PubMed ID: 38697351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noblesse oblige: critical issues at the highest level of clinical evidence.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():vi-viii. PubMed ID: 30654870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and meta-analysis as a support tools for research and clinical practice.
    Villasís-Keever MÁ; Rendón-Macías ME; García H; Miranda-Novales MG; Escamilla-Núñez A
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 32447868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review, meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials in cytopathology.
    AbdullGaffar B
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 22555521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology: A review.
    Pitman MB; Layfield LJ
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jun; 122(6):399-411. PubMed ID: 24777782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Principles and Practice.
    Shrestha BM
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):1-2. PubMed ID: 31080236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project.
    Herner M
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2019 Aug; 24(4):130-132. PubMed ID: 30842066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions.
    Chaimani A; Caldwell DM; Li T; Higgins JPT; Salanti G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():65-74. PubMed ID: 28088593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based urology in practice: heterogeneity in a systematic review meta-analysis.
    Imamura M; Cook J; Maclennan S; N'dow J; Dahm P;
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 20067453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prioritization of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
    Presley C; Rundle CW; Kolodziejczyk T; Andrews S; Shumaker P; Anand P; Lee K; Dellavalle RP; Boyle RJ
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Dec; 181(6):1303-1304. PubMed ID: 31145811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Haase SC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):955-966. PubMed ID: 21285802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized cytopathology training through accreditation in the United States.
    Tambouret R; Nayar R; Pitman MB; Ehya H
    Cytopathology; 2010 Jun; 21(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 20557347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.
    van Tulder MW; Assendelft WJ; Koes BW; Bouter LM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2323-30. PubMed ID: 9355211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published studies: an overview and best practices.
    Mandrekar JN; Mandrekar SJ
    J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Aug; 6(8):1301-3. PubMed ID: 21847059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Paul M; Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Mar; 27(3):311-314. PubMed ID: 33217559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.