BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381435)

  • 1. Passenger muscle responses in lane change and lane change with braking maneuvers using two belt configurations: Standard and reversible pre-pretensioner.
    Ghaffari G; Brolin K; Pipkorn B; Jakobsson L; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S43-S51. PubMed ID: 31381435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female kinematics and muscle responses in lane change and lane change with braking maneuvers.
    Ghaffari G; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):236-241. PubMed ID: 33688754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of vehicle countermeasures and age on human volunteer kinematics during evasive swerving events.
    Holt C; Seacrist T; Douglas E; Graci V; Kerrigan J; Kent R; Balasubramanian S; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 31750733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions.
    Osth J; Brolin K; Bråse D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():304-13. PubMed ID: 24950131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seat belt pre-pretensioner effect on child-sized dummies during run-off-road events.
    Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S96-S102. PubMed ID: 28402687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models.
    Osth J; Olafsdóttir JM; Davidsson J; Brolin K
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2013 Nov; 57():1-41. PubMed ID: 24435725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the motion of booster-seated children during simulated in-vehicle precrash maneuvers.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S75-S80. PubMed ID: 31385726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of automated versus manual emergency braking on rear seat adult and pediatric occupant precrash motion.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S106-S111. PubMed ID: 31381438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison across vehicles of passenger head kinematics in abrupt vehicle maneuvers.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Jones MLH; Park BD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S128-S132. PubMed ID: 31800326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematics and shoulder belt engagement of children on belt-positioning boosters during evasive steering maneuvers.
    Baker G; Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L; Osvalder AL; Svensson M; Wimmerstedt M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S131-S138. PubMed ID: 29584480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a 3-point harness restraint and car seat in whiplash-type lateral impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y; Jones T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):E11-8. PubMed ID: 16395161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volunteer kinematics and reaction in lateral emergency maneuver tests.
    Rooij Lv; Elrofai H; Philippens MM; Daanen HA
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2013 Nov; 57():313-42. PubMed ID: 24435737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repositioning forward-leaning passengers by seatbelt pre-pretensioning.
    Mishra E; Mroz K; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(8):716-721. PubMed ID: 37676070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passenger muscle responses in emergency braking events with reclined seating.
    Ren L; Kang Y; Tan Z; Jiang C; Hu Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 38168918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The occupant response to autonomous braking: a modeling approach that accounts for active musculature.
    Östh J; Brolin K; Carlsson S; Wismans J; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 22607249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Jones MLH; Park BD; Hallman JJ; Sherony R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S70-S77. PubMed ID: 30543309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age Differences in Occupant Motion during Simulated In-Vehicle Swerving Maneuvers.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32178285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frontal crash seat belt restraint effectiveness and comfort accessories used by older occupants.
    Whyte T; Kent N; Keay L; Coxon K; Brown J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 31815527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.