These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381437)
21. Multiple Event-Based Simulation Scenario Generation Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Smart Sensors and Devices. Park J; Wen M; Sung Y; Cho K Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31615164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data. Wang S; Li Z Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():44-54. PubMed ID: 31103878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario. Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment. Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system. Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Liu S; Xiang Y Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 26761633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When does alcohol hurt? A driving simulator study. Vollrath M; Fischer J Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Dec; 109():89-98. PubMed ID: 29054000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios. Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to assess driver's interaction with partially automated driving systems - A framework for early concept assessment. van den Beukel AP; van der Voort MC Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):302-312. PubMed ID: 27890141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality. Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A hierarchical hybrid system of integrated longitudinal and lateral control for intelligent vehicles. Chen K; Pei X; Okuda H; Zhu M; Guo X; Guo K; Suzuki T ISA Trans; 2020 Nov; 106():200-212. PubMed ID: 32674851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers. Teoh ER; Kidd DG J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck. Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control. Eriksson A; Stanton NA Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of curbs on driver behaviors in four-lane rural highways--A driving simulator based study. Yang Q; Overton R; Han LD; Yan X; Richards SH Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1289-97. PubMed ID: 23084096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour. Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An entropy-based analysis of lane changing behavior: An interactive approach. Kosun C; Ozdemir S Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):441-447. PubMed ID: 27603156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An open simulation approach to identify chances and limitations for vulnerable road user (VRU) active safety. Seiniger P; Bartels O; Pastor C; Wisch M Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S2-12. PubMed ID: 23905588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Examining traffic conflicts of up stream toll plaza area using vehicles' trajectory data. Xing L; He J; Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Li Y; Zheng O Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():174-187. PubMed ID: 30771587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]