These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381438)

  • 1. Effect of automated versus manual emergency braking on rear seat adult and pediatric occupant precrash motion.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S106-S111. PubMed ID: 31381438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of the motion of booster-seated children during simulated in-vehicle precrash maneuvers.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S75-S80. PubMed ID: 31385726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts - with and without automatic emergency braking.
    Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Falciani C; Belwadi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S49-S53. PubMed ID: 33095067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Female kinematics and muscle responses in lane change and lane change with braking maneuvers.
    Ghaffari G; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):236-241. PubMed ID: 33688754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Passenger muscle responses in lane change and lane change with braking maneuvers using two belt configurations: Standard and reversible pre-pretensioner.
    Ghaffari G; Brolin K; Pipkorn B; Jakobsson L; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S43-S51. PubMed ID: 31381435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of vehicle countermeasures and age on human volunteer kinematics during evasive swerving events.
    Holt C; Seacrist T; Douglas E; Graci V; Kerrigan J; Kent R; Balasubramanian S; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 31750733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison across vehicles of passenger head kinematics in abrupt vehicle maneuvers.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Jones MLH; Park BD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S128-S132. PubMed ID: 31800326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model.
    Guleyupoglu B; Schap J; Kusano KD; Gayzik FS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 28102701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Jones MLH; Park BD; Hallman JJ; Sherony R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S70-S77. PubMed ID: 30543309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age Differences in Occupant Motion during Simulated In-Vehicle Swerving Maneuvers.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32178285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of Q6 and PIPER 6-year-old models on quantification of the change of child sitting posture with AEB and its impact on child's injures in frontal crash.
    Zhang X; Feng B; Xue Z; Liu Y; Ye X; Tu W
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 38717827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions.
    Osth J; Brolin K; Bråse D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():304-13. PubMed ID: 24950131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.