257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31381488)
1. New Insight in Noninvasive Rejuvenation: The Role of a Rhodamine-Intense Pulsed Light System.
Cannarozzo G; Bonciani D; Tamburi F; Mazzilli S; Garofalo V; Del Duca E; Sannino M; Zingoni T; Nisticò SP
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2019 Sep; 37(9):539-543. PubMed ID: 31381488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sequential facial skin rejuvenation with intense pulsed light and non-ablative fractionated laser resurfacing in fitzpatrick skin type II-IV patients: A prospective multicenter analysis.
Knight JM; Kautz G
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Feb; 51(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30091207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive rejuvenation of photodamaged skin using serial, full-face intense pulsed light treatments.
Bitter PH
Dermatol Surg; 2000 Sep; 26(9):835-42; discussion 843. PubMed ID: 10971556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light With a KTP/PDLlike Filter for the Treatment of Facial Telangiectasias.
Peterson JD; Friedmann DP; Abdo K; Cahana Z
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Sep; 19(9):844-850. PubMed ID: 33026752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage.
Varughese N; Keller L; Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Aug; 18(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 27183026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combination of Fractional CO
Nistico SP; Silvestri M; Zingoni T; Tamburi F; Bennardo L; Cannarozzo G
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Feb; 39(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 33449867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rejuvenation of photoaged skin: 5 years results with intense pulsed light of the face, neck, and chest.
Weiss RA; Weiss MA; Beasley KL
Dermatol Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):1115-9. PubMed ID: 12472489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IPL vs PDL in treatment of facial erythema: A split-face study.
Handler MZ; Bloom BS; Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 16(4):450-453. PubMed ID: 28752575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open-label study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of topical skin care and sun protection alone and in combination with intense pulsed light therapy.
Deaver Peterson J; Katz TM
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Dec; 18(6):1758-1764. PubMed ID: 31017734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective study on the clinical efficacy of the intense pulsed light source for photodamage and skin rejuvenation.
Ping C; Xueliang D; Yongxuan L; Lin D; Bilai L; Shaoming L; Gold MH
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Aug; 18(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 26734811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined treatment for facial rejuvenation using an optimized pulsed light source followed by a fractional non-ablative laser.
Chan CS; Saedi N; Mickle C; Dover JS
Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Sep; 45(7):405-9. PubMed ID: 23922184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective analysis for facial telangiectasia treatment using pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands.
Gao L; Qu H; Gao N; Li K; Dang E; Tan W; Wang G
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Jan; 19(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 31638320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rhodamine intense pulsed light versus conventional intense pulsed light for facial telangiectasias.
Piccolo D; Crisman G; Kostaki D; Cannarozzo G; Sannino M; Chimenti S
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016; 18(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 26736070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open-label study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of topical skincare and sun protection products following intense pulsed light treatment.
Jones IT; Guiha I; Fabi SG
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Jun; 17(3):441-447. PubMed ID: 29164778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intense pulsed light with 1,927-nm fractionated thulium fiber laser for the rejuvenation of the chest.
Wu DC; Friedmann DP; Fabi SG; Goldman MP; Fitzpatrick RE
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 24354711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review.
Sales AFS; Pandolfo IL; de Almeida Cruz M; Parisi JR; Garcia LA; Martignago CCS; Renno ACM; Vassão PG
Arch Dermatol Res; 2022 Nov; 314(9):823-838. PubMed ID: 34609598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial photo rejuvenation using two different intense pulsed light (IPL) wavelength bands.
Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A; Dierickx C
Lasers Surg Med; 2004; 34(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15004823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
