888 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31384886)
1. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. History, development and future of cancer screening in Australia.
Olver IN; Roder D
Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Jul; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 28765858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
Ee H; St John J
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1450-1461. PubMed ID: 30190276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lessons from the renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Smith M; Hammond I; Saville M
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.
Lew JB; Simms KT; Smith MA; Hall M; Kang YJ; Xu XM; Caruana M; Velentzis LS; Bessell T; Saville M; Hammond I; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Feb; 2(2):e96-e107. PubMed ID: 29253402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer screening in Australia: future directions in melanoma, Lynch syndrome, and liver, lung and prostate cancers.
Weber MF; Marshall HM; Rankin N; Duffy S; Fong KM; Dunlop K; Humphries L; Smit AK; Cust AE; Taylor N; Mitchell G; Kang YJ; Tucker K; Jenkins M; Macrae F; Lockart I; Danta M; Armstrong BK; Howe M
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: demonstrating the potential value of comprehensive real world data.
Tran B; Keating CL; Ananda SS; Kosmider S; Jones I; Croxford M; Field KM; Carter RC; Gibbs P
Intern Med J; 2012 Jul; 42(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 21883782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving breast cancer screening in Australia: a public health perspective.
Nickson C; Velentzis LS; Brennan P; Mann GB; Houssami N
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay S
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 32556187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
Worthington J; Feletto E; Lew JB; Broun K; Durkin S; Wakefield M; Grogan P; Harper T; Canfell K
Public Health; 2020 Feb; 179():90-99. PubMed ID: 31760206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
Ouakrim DA; Boussioutas A; Lockett T; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA
BMC Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14():261. PubMed ID: 24735237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How will transitioning from cytology to HPV testing change the balance between the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening? Estimates of the impact on cervical cancer, treatment rates and adverse obstetric outcomes in Australia, a high vaccination coverage country.
Velentzis LS; Caruana M; Simms KT; Lew JB; Shi JF; Saville M; Smith MA; Lord SJ; Tan J; Bateson D; Quinn M; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2017 Dec; 141(12):2410-2422. PubMed ID: 28801947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Responsible cancer screening].
Verbeek AL; van Dijck JA; Kiemeney LA; Broeders MJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(45):A3934. PubMed ID: 22085573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
