These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31385240)
1. How prior testing impacts misinformation processing: A dual-task approach. Gordon LT; Bilolikar VK; Hodhod T; Thomas AK Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):314-324. PubMed ID: 31385240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility. LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm. Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm. Gordon LT; Thomas AK Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 24027043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of testing can increase or decrease misinformation susceptibility depending on the retention interval. Thomas AK; Gordon LT; Cernasov PM; Bulevich JB Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):45. PubMed ID: 29214206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing increases suggestibility for narrative-based misinformation but reduces suggestibility for question-based misinformation. LaPaglia JA; Chan JC Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 24105926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies. Heyselaar E; Segaert K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect. Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories. Kiat JE; Belli RF Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 May; 141():199-208. PubMed ID: 28442391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding. Karanian JM; Thomas AK; Race E Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):440-452. PubMed ID: 38504050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval. Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm. Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval. Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses. Chan JC; Langley MM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrepancy detection in the retrieval-enhanced suggestibility paradigm. Butler BJ; Loftus EF Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 28899262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in eyewitness memory for a realistic event. West RL; Stone KR J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 May; 69(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 23531920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration. Doherty JM; Belletier C; Rhodes S; Jaroslawska A; Barrouillet P; Camos V; Cowan N; Naveh-Benjamin M; Logie RH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1529-1551. PubMed ID: 30407025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Semantic Vigilance Impaired by Narrative Memory Demands? Theory and Applications. Epling SL; Edgar GK; Russell PN; Helton WS Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 30325648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training. Kattner F; Samaan L; Schubert T Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1044-1061. PubMed ID: 30805872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]