These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31385394)

  • 1. Comparison of alternative approaches to trim subjects in the tails of the propensity score distribution.
    Glynn RJ; Lunt M; Rothman KJ; Poole C; Schneeweiss S; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Oct; 28(10):1290-1298. PubMed ID: 31385394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity Score Weighting and Trimming Strategies for Reducing Variance and Bias of Treatment Effect Estimates: A Simulation Study.
    Stürmer T; Webster-Clark M; Lund JL; Wyss R; Ellis AR; Lunt M; Rothman KJ; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1659-1670. PubMed ID: 33615349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):802-11. PubMed ID: 24478163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multinomial Extension of Propensity Score Trimming Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Yoshida K; Solomon DH; Haneuse S; Kim SC; Patorno E; Tedeschi SK; Lyu H; Franklin JM; Stürmer T; Hernández-Díaz S; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 188(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 30517602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation.
    Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the impact of propensity score estimation and implementation on covariate balance and confounding control within and across important subgroups in comparative effectiveness research.
    Girman CJ; Gokhale M; Kou TD; Brodovicz KG; Wyss R; Stürmer T
    Med Care; 2014 Mar; 52(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 24374422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matching on the disease risk score in comparative effectiveness research of new treatments.
    Wyss R; Ellis AR; Brookhart MA; Jonsson Funk M; Girman CJ; Simpson RJ; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):951-61. PubMed ID: 26112690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing Imbalance in the Tails of the Propensity Score Distribution.
    DiPrete BL; Girman CJ; Mavros P; Breskin A; Brookhart MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 37830395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addressing substantial covariate imbalance with propensity score stratification and balancing weights: connections and recommendations.
    Thomas LE; Thomas SM; Li F; Matsouaka RA
    Epidemiol Methods; 2023 Jan; 12(1):20220131. PubMed ID: 38013684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.
    Stürmer T; Rothman KJ; Avorn J; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 172(7):843-54. PubMed ID: 20716704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A tool for empirical equipoise assessment in multigroup comparative effectiveness research.
    Yoshida K; Solomon DH; Haneuse S; Kim SC; Patorno E; Tedeschi SK; Lyu H; Hernández-Díaz S; Glynn RJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jul; 28(7):934-941. PubMed ID: 31131965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
    Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propensity score models in observational comparative effectiveness studies: cornerstone of design or statistical afterthought?
    Robinson JW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 24237373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring balance and model selection in propensity score methods.
    Belitser SV; Martens EP; Pestman WR; Groenwold RH; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1115-29. PubMed ID: 21805529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation study.
    Wyss R; Girman CJ; LoCasale RJ; Brookhart AM; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23070806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.
    Wyss R; Ellis AR; Brookhart MA; Girman CJ; Jonsson Funk M; LoCasale R; Stürmer T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 25143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.