These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31385609)

  • 1. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.
    Wang C; Xu G; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):223-254. PubMed ID: 27796763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A semi-parametric within-subject mixture approach to the analyses of responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M; Vermunt JK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):205-228. PubMed ID: 29044460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Mixture Fluency model using responses and response times with cognitive diagnosis model framework.
    Liu Z; Wang S; Zhang S; Qiu T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3396-3451. PubMed ID: 38361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A heteroscedastic hidden Markov mixture model for responses and categorized response times.
    Molenaar D; Rózsa S; Bolsinova M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):676-696. PubMed ID: 30924104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
    Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
    Shu Z; Henson R; Luecht R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):481-97. PubMed ID: 25106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.
    Jin KY; Hsu CL; Chiu MM; Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 36425284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A speeded item response model: leave the harder till later.
    Chang YW; Tsai RC; Hsu NJ
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):255-74. PubMed ID: 24659371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latent mixed Markov modelling of smoking transitions using Monte Carlo bootstrapping.
    Mannan HR; Koval JJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):125-46. PubMed ID: 12665207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hidden Markov Item Response Theory Models for Responses and Response Times.
    Molenaar D; Oberski D; Vermunt J; De Boeck P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):606-626. PubMed ID: 27712114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey analysis with mixture Rasch models.
    Dallas AD; Willse JT
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 25232672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing hierarchical models via the marginalized deviance information criterion.
    Quintero A; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2440-2454. PubMed ID: 29579777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.