These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31385610)

  • 1. Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.
    Khorramdel L; von Davier M; Pokropek A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):538-559. PubMed ID: 31385610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 31292952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IRTree models with ordinal and multidimensional decision nodes for response styles and trait-based rating responses.
    Meiser T; Plieninger H; Henninger M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 30756379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M; Jeon M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2325-2344. PubMed ID: 29322400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
    Park M; Wu AD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):911-930. PubMed ID: 31488919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using IRTree Models to Promote Selection Validity in the Presence of Extreme Response Styles.
    Quirk VL; Kern JL
    J Intell; 2023 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 37998715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.
    Kim N; Bolt DM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Feb; 81(1):131-154. PubMed ID: 33456065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.
    Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes.
    Merhof V; Meiser T
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1354-1380. PubMed ID: 36746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring Response Styles Across the Big Five: A Multiscale Extension of an Approach Using Multinomial Processing Trees.
    Khorramdel L; von Davier M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 26741175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Co-occurring dominance and ideal point processes: A general IRTree framework for multidimensional item responding.
    Merhof V; Meiser T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of a Longitudinal IRTree Model: Response Style Changes Over Time.
    Ames AJ; Leventhal BC
    Assessment; 2023 Mar; 30(2):332-347. PubMed ID: 34663110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo study of IRTree models' ability to recover item parameters.
    Alarcon GM; Lee MA; Johnson D
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1003756. PubMed ID: 36949921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models.
    Leventhal BC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):322-335. PubMed ID: 31156283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: Explore Conditional Dependencies in Item Response Tree Data.
    Jeon M
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):803-808. PubMed ID: 37106310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.
    Schoenmakers M; Tijmstra J; Vermunt J; Bolsinova M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):145-170. PubMed ID: 38250509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1168-1195. PubMed ID: 33116331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.