These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3138670)

  • 1. Resource utilization groups. DRGs move to long-term care.
    Mitty EL
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):539-57. PubMed ID: 3138670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The resource utilization group system: its effect on nursing home case mix and costs.
    Thorpe KE; Gertler PJ; Goldman P
    Inquiry; 1991; 28(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 1761308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resource utilization groups. A patient classification system for long-term care.
    Fries BE; Cooney LM
    Med Care; 1985 Feb; 23(2):110-22. PubMed ID: 3919222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Care needs of residents in community-based long-term care facilities in Taiwan.
    Li IC; Yin TJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Jul; 14(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15946279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of using case mix and prospective payment for Medicare skilled nursing facilities.
    Liu K; Wiener J; Schieber G; Doty P
    Inquiry; 1986; 23(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 2947857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome following fractured neck of femur--variation in acute hospital care or case mix?
    Withey C; Morris R; Beech R; Backhouse A
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 8639342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prospective payment in medical rehabilitation].
    Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12813650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroke hospitalization under prospective payments: analysis of diagnosis related group 14.
    Lagoe RJ; Lauko SJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Nov; 66(11):773-6. PubMed ID: 3933453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients.
    Shaughnessy PW; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Polesovsky MB
    Inquiry; 1985; 22(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 3159672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.
    Schlenker RE; Kramer AM; Hrincevich CA; Eilertsen TB
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Dec; 32(5):651-68. PubMed ID: 9402906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective payment for rehabilitation: effects on hospital readmission, home care, and placement.
    Evans RL; Hendricks RD; Bishop DS; Lawrence-Umlauf KV; Kirk C; Halar EM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Apr; 71(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 2109588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part 2, Responding to PPS. Development and interpretation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Feb; 38(2):72-4, 78-84. PubMed ID: 10315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
    Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
    Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-mix classification system for long-term care facilities.
    Zbylot S; Job C; Mccormick E; Boulter C; Moore A
    Nurs Manage; 1995 Apr; 26(4):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 7731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PPS challenges in postacute care.
    Stahl DA
    Nurs Manage; 1998 Aug; 29(8):10-2. PubMed ID: 9807382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost containment, DRGs, and the ethics of health care. The impact of DRGs on health care workers and their clients.
    Powderly KE; Smith E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 2497080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RUGs and "Medi-Cal" systems for classifying nursing home patients.
    Grimaldi PL
    Health Prog; 1985 Dec; 66(10):50-7. PubMed ID: 10300512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective payment in long-term care--a new challenge in assessment and care planning.
    Hebert M
    Continuum; 1998; 18(6):1, 3-9. PubMed ID: 10558088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misconceptions about case-mix payments for nursing homes.
    Grimaldi PL
    Health Prog; 1987 Apr; 68(3):42-7. PubMed ID: 10312078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.