These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3138673)

  • 1. DRGs: nursing documentation contributes to the bottom line.
    Hines GL
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):579-86. PubMed ID: 3138673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DRG prospective reimbursement: the nursing intensity factor.
    Prescott PA
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Jan; 17(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3079896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care.
    Törnvall E; Wilhelmsson S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2116-24. PubMed ID: 18710374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flow sheet for better documentation in the labour room.
    Light I; Immanuel MS; Augustine A; Seshadri L
    Nurs J India; 2000 Mar; 91(3):70. PubMed ID: 11052024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Institutional and economic influences on quality of nursing documentation.
    Parker LE; Wells KB; Buchanan JL; Benjamin B
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1994; 19(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 7896558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Getting the most out of DRGs.
    Mohlenbrock WC
    Group Pract J; 1985; 34(5):27-32. PubMed ID: 10311974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DRG "creep". Pitfalls and sanctions to avoid.
    Kusserow RP; Steeley BL
    Consultant; 1989 Mar; 29(3):93-5, 98-9. PubMed ID: 10312909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How hospital medical record departments can benefit from retrospective DRG review.
    Small P
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 10113165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Encoding of diagnosis by medical documentation assistant or ward physician. Influence on the mapping of Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) performance].
    Tischendorf JJ; Crede S; Herrmann P; Bach N; Bömeke C; Manns MP; Schaefer O; Trautwein C
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Aug; 129(33):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15295683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the effect of illness severity on revenue under DRGs.
    Brewster AC; Bradbury RC; Jacobs CM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Jul; 39(7):52-3, 56-60. PubMed ID: 10311153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Room for improvement: gastrointestinal disorders and payment errors.
    Terry KM; Bodenheimer MM; Davis G; Goldstein A
    J Community Health; 2008 Jun; 33(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 18181013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reshuffling the DRG deck. New cardiac DRGs praised for more equitable reimbursements while post-acute-transfer changes are generating some worries.
    DoBias M; Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(41):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16250144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New DRGs may affect your hospital's reimbursement.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Apr; 14(4):51-3. PubMed ID: 16562574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicare's value-based payment initiatives: impact on and implications for improving physician documentation and coding.
    Rosenstein AH; O'Daniel M; White S; Taylor K
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 19461068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All-payer severity-adjusted diagnosis-related groups: a uniform method to severity-adjust discharge data.
    Leary RS; Johantgen ME; Farley D; Forthman MT; Wooster LD
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):60-71. PubMed ID: 10165388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DRGs and hospital case records: implications for Medicare case mix accuracy.
    Johnson AN; Appel GL
    Inquiry; 1984; 21(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 6237993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The critical care nurse's documentation: a liability perspective.
    Jacobsen KA
    QRC Advis; 2000 Jul; 16(9):4-8. PubMed ID: 11183157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MS-DRG system offers opportunities, potential changes in the bottom line. Accurately documenting severity of illness is the key to success.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Dec; 15(12):177-80. PubMed ID: 18092570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.