157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31386926)
1. Comparison of psychometric properties between the Labin, a new electronic dynamometer, and the Jamar: Preliminary results in healthy subjects.
Conforto I; Samir C; Chausse F; Goldstein A; Pereira B; Coudeyre E
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 38(5):293-297. PubMed ID: 31386926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.
Cildan Uysal S; Tonak HA; Kitis A
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 41(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 35283336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.
Lee SC; Wu LC; Chiang SL; Lu LH; Chen CY; Lin CH; Ni CH; Lin CH
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6936879. PubMed ID: 32382565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.
King TI
Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 23791323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two electronic dynamometers for measuring handgrip strength.
Rolsted SK; Andersen KD; Dandanell G; Dall CH; Zilmer CK; Bülow K; Kristensen MT
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101692. PubMed ID: 38705572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.
Kanauchi Y; Murase T; Nishiwaki M; Odagiri M; Wanezaki Y; Ishikawa H
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2023 Oct; 28(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 37881817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.
Huang L; Liu Y; Lin T; Hou L; Song Q; Ge N; Yue J
BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):580. PubMed ID: 35840905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.
Guerra RS; Amaral TF; Sousa AS; Fonseca I; Pichel F; Restivo MT
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1931-1940. PubMed ID: 28640771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.
Mühldorfer-Fodor M; Ziegler S; Harms C; Neumann J; Cristalli A; Kalpen A; Kundt G; Mittlmeier T; Prommersberger KJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1179-88. PubMed ID: 24935661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.
Vermeulen J; Neyens JC; Spreeuwenberg MD; van Rossum E; Hewson DJ; de Witte LP
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 25594521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength.
Mathiowetz V
Occup Ther Int; 2002; 9(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12374997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.
Stamate A; Bertolaccini J; Deriaz M; Gunjan S; Marzan MD; Spiru L
Am J Occup Ther; 2023 Sep; 77(5):. PubMed ID: 37824723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.
Sipers WM; Verdijk LB; Sipers SJ; Schols JM; van Loon LJ
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2016 May; 17(5):466.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27107163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-retest reliability of handgrip strength measurement using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Savva C; Giakas G; Efstathiou M; Karagiannis C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014; 37(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 24630769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer.
Hamilton GF; McDonald C; Chenier TC
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 16(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 18796752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the strength endurance parameters for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) Simulator II and the Jamar Handgrip Dynamometer.
Myers E; Triscari R
Work; 2017; 57(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28506016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years.
Hogrel JY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():139. PubMed ID: 26055647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.
Molenaar HM; Zuidam JM; Selles RW; Stam HJ; Hovius SE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1053-9. PubMed ID: 18451398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of hand grip strength: A cross-sectional study of two dynamometry devices.
Lupton-Smith A; Fourie K; Mazinyo A; Mokone M; Nxaba S; Morrow B
S Afr J Physiother; 2022; 78(1):1768. PubMed ID: 36262213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.
Kim M; Shinkai S
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Nov; 17(11):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 28517036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
