These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31387064)

  • 1. Errors in Reporting Significant Figures in Surgical and Medical Journals in 2017.
    Leaphart DM; Cronley AC; Brothers TE
    J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():567-573. PubMed ID: 31387064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals: a systematic review.
    Charan J; Saxena D
    J Postgrad Med; 2014; 60(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 25370542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical errors in articles published in radiology journals.
    Günel Karadeniz P; Uzabacı E; Atış Kuyuk S; Kaskır Kesin F; Can FE; Seçil M; Ercan İ
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 30582574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.
    Wu R; Glen P; Ramsay T; Martel G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():70. PubMed ID: 24972453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical Reporting in Nursing Research: Addressing a Common Error in Reporting of p Values (p = .000).
    Wu Y; Zhou C; Wang R; Ye X; Yang L; Li C; Hu M; Cong W
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 Nov; 52(6):688-695. PubMed ID: 32890425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.
    Müllner M; Matthews H; Altman DG
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 11790063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference citations in radiology: accuracy and appropriateness of use in two major journals.
    Hansen ME; McIntire DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 8079876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency errors in p-values reported in Spanish psychology journals.
    Caperos JM; Pardo A
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 23910759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The statistical reporting quality of articles published in 2010 in five dental journals.
    Vähänikkilä H; Tjäderhane L; Nieminen P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 73(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 25373621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research design and statistical methods in Chinese medical journals.
    Wang Q; Zhang B
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):283-5. PubMed ID: 9676683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of using statistical methods in selected national medical journals].
    Sych Z
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1996; 42():67-84. PubMed ID: 9199127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.
    Callaham M; Wears RL; Weber E
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2847-50. PubMed ID: 12038930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errata in medical publications.
    Hauptman PJ; Armbrecht ES; Chibnall JT; Guild C; Timm JP; Rich MW
    Am J Med; 2014 Aug; 127(8):779-785.e1. PubMed ID: 24662621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact factor and study design: the Academic Value of Published Research (AVaRes) score.
    Wolf DM; Williamson PA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Jan; 91(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 18990264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inappropriate use of standard error of the mean when reporting variability of study samples: a critical evaluation of four selected journals of obstetrics and gynecology.
    Ko WR; Hung WT; Chang HC; Lin LY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 53(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 24767642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
    Rongen JJ; Hannink G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.