These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31387122)

  • 21. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
    Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level.
    Park DH; Ramakrishnan P; Cho TH; Lorenz E; Eck JC; Humphreys SC; Lim TH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Sep; 7(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 17877270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Loading effects of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments.
    Wang CS; Chang JH; Chang TS; Chen HY; Cheng CW
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Nov; 28(11):586-94. PubMed ID: 23140766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subaxial Cervical Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Kinematics Following Atlantoaxial Fixation in Different Angles.
    Liu Q; Guo Q; Yang J; Zhang P; Xu T; Cheng X; Chen J; Guan H; Ni B
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 87():521-8. PubMed ID: 26409072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
    Hussain M; Nassr A; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is Cervical Sagittal Imbalance a Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Pathomechanics After Multilevel Fusion?
    Patwardhan AG; Khayatzadeh S; Nguyen NL; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Muriuki MG; Carandang G; Smith ZA; Sears W; Lomasney LM; Ghanayem AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):E580-8. PubMed ID: 26630432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.
    Wu TK; Meng Y; Wang BY; Rong X; Hong Y; Ding C; Chen H; Liu H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 30704444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion.
    Prasarn ML; Baria D; Milne E; Latta L; Sukovich W
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22136389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Konar S; Sharma A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcome of Ventral Fusion of Two or Three Cervical Vertebrae with a Locking Compression Plate for the Treatment of Cervical Stenotic Myelopathy in Eight Horses.
    Kühnle C; Fürst AE; Ranninger E; Suárez Sánchez-Andrade J; Kümmerle JM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Sep; 31(5):356-363. PubMed ID: 30138950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.
    Elsawaf A; Mastronardi L; Roperto R; Bozzao A; Caroli M; Ferrante L
    Neurosurg Rev; 2009 Apr; 32(2):215-24; discussion 224. PubMed ID: 18846395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of a contributing factor for cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy using computed tomography for measuring the cervical vertebral volume.
    Kondo T; Mashimo Y; Sato F; Tsuzuki N; Yamada K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 84(8):1084-1087. PubMed ID: 35675981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Finite Element Analysis of Biomechanics of Cervical Spine after Dynamic Cervical Implant Surgery].
    Wang C; Zhao G; Bai L; Chen N; Song Y; Chen E; Zhao Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 33(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 29714901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the biomechanical properties of a ventral cervical intervertebral anchored fusion device with locking plate fixation applied to cadaveric canine cervical spines.
    Schöllhorn B; Bürki A; Stahl C; Howard J; Forterre F
    Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 24033669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.