These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31388375)

  • 1. Construct and predictive validity of the Strength of Motivation for Medical School-Revised (SMMS-R) questionnaire: a French validation study.
    Abbiati M; Severac F; Baroffio A; Pelaccia T
    Can Med Educ J; 2019 Jul; 10(3):e39-e48. PubMed ID: 31388375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement invariance of the strength of motivation for medical school: a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    An M; Kusurkar RA; Li L; Xiao Y; Zheng C; Hu J; Chen M
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jul; 17(1):116. PubMed ID: 28697733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity evidence for the measurement of the strength of motivation for medical school.
    Kusurkar R; Croiset G; Kruitwagen C; ten Cate O
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 20953836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength of Motivation among Public and Private Dental Students for the Field of Education: A Comparative and Correlational Study.
    Ahmed MS; Hassan F; Ullah S; Shaid F; Sabih M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Apr; 31(4):461-465. PubMed ID: 33866735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring Strength of Motivation for Medical School.
    Nieuwhof MG; ThJ Ten Cate O; Oosterveld P; Soethout MB
    Med Educ Online; 2004 Dec; 9(1):4355. PubMed ID: 28253126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [French validation of the anger reactions and goals scale (RBC)].
    Recchia S; Steffgen G; Weber H; Kubiak T
    Encephale; 2010 Jun; 36(3):202-11. PubMed ID: 20620262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of an Arabic version of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire R-SPQ-2F.
    Munshi FM; Al-Rukban MO; Al-Hoqail I
    J Family Community Med; 2012 Jan; 19(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 22518356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age, gender and educational background on strength of motivation for medical school.
    Kusurkar R; Kruitwagen C; ten Cate O; Croiset G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 19774476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].
    Masson AM; Cadot M; Pereira AM; Depreeuw E; Ansseau M
    Encephale; 2001; 27(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 11865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the cross-cultural sensitivity of the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and validation of a Dutch version.
    Stes A; De Maeyer S; Van Petegem P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54099. PubMed ID: 23342085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rasch Analysis of the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: A Validation Study.
    Mogol V; Chen Y; Henning M; Wearn A; Weller J; Yielder J; Bagg W
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(4):428-441. PubMed ID: 30433884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of academic success of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades.
    Luqman M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23286620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in Ghanaian medical students.
    Mogre V; Amalba A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2014; 11():19. PubMed ID: 25112447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.
    Biggs J; Kember D; Leung DY
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2001 Mar; 71(Pt 1):133-49. PubMed ID: 11307705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: an investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis.
    Fox RA; McManus IC; Winder BC
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2001 Dec; 71(Pt 4):511-30. PubMed ID: 11802815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning approach among health sciences students in a medical college in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.
    Shah DK; Yadav RL; Sharma D; Yadav PK; Sapkota NK; Jha RK; Islam MN
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2016; 7():137-43. PubMed ID: 27019603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of problem-based learning on students' approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education.
    Tiwari A; Chan S; Wong E; Wong D; Chui C; Wong A; Patil N
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Jul; 26(5):430-8. PubMed ID: 16442672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring achievement goal motivation, mindsets and cognitive load: validation of three instruments' scores.
    Cook DA; Castillo RM; Gas B; Artino AR
    Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1061-1074. PubMed ID: 28901645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between assessment methods and self-directed learning readiness in medical education.
    Monroe KS
    Int J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 7():75-80. PubMed ID: 26970653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Psychometric analysis of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale in undergraduate Serbian healthcare student context.
    Milutinović D; Lovrić R; Simin D
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Jun; 65():74-80. PubMed ID: 29533837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.