These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31388864)

  • 1. Imager-4D: New Software for Viewing Dynamic PET Scans and Extracting Radiomic Parameters from PET Data.
    Rowe SP; Solnes LB; Yin Y; Kitchen G; Lodge MA; Karakatsanis NA; Rahmim A; Pomper MG; Leal JP
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Dec; 32(6):1071-1080. PubMed ID: 31388864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
    Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
    Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
    Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET.
    Orlhac F; Boughdad S; Philippe C; Stalla-Bourdillon H; Nioche C; Champion L; Soussan M; Frouin F; Frouin V; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 59(8):1321-1328. PubMed ID: 29301932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of
    Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiomics based on
    Ou X; Zhang J; Wang J; Pang F; Wang Y; Wei X; Ma X
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 31769230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical Note: Ontology-guided radiomics analysis workflow (O-RAW).
    Shi Z; Traverso A; van Soest J; Dekker A; Wee L
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5677-5684. PubMed ID: 31580484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Analysis of Radiomic Datasets by RadAR.
    Benelli M; Barucci A; Zoppetti N; Calusi S; Redapi L; Della Gala G; Piffer S; Bernardi L; Fusi F; Pallotta S
    Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 80(15):3170-3174. PubMed ID: 32540962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
    Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding the temporal domain to PET radiomic features.
    Noortman WA; Vriens D; Slump CH; Bussink J; Meijer TWH; de Geus-Oei LF; van Velden FHP
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239438. PubMed ID: 32966313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency based gating: An alternative, conformal, approach to 4D PET data utilization.
    Kesner AL; Chung JH; Lind KE; Kwak JJ; Lynch D; Burckhardt D; Koo PJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1451-61. PubMed ID: 26936729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic modeling for patients with colorectal liver metastases incorporating FDG PET radiomic features.
    Rahmim A; Bak-Fredslund KP; Ashrafinia S; Lu L; Schmidtlein CR; Subramaniam RM; Morsing A; Keiding S; Horsager J; Munk OL
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():101-109. PubMed ID: 30927933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion compensation for fully 4D PET reconstruction using PET superset data.
    Verhaeghe J; Gravel P; Mio R; Fukasawa R; Rosa-Neto P; Soucy JP; Thompson CJ; Reader AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4063-82. PubMed ID: 20601774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PET/CT image navigation and communication.
    Ratib O
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():46S-55S. PubMed ID: 14736835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation-maximization reconstruction.
    Karakatsanis NA; Casey ME; Lodge MA; Rahmim A; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(15):5456-85. PubMed ID: 27383991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimized Feature Extraction for Radiomics Analysis of
    Papp L; Rausch I; Grahovac M; Hacker M; Beyer T
    J Nucl Med; 2019 Jun; 60(6):864-872. PubMed ID: 30389820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of the impact of motion compensation on the variability of PET image features.
    Carles M; Bach T; Torres-Espallardo I; Baltas D; Nestle U; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(6):065013. PubMed ID: 29469054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 4-Dimensional MRI and Attenuation Map Generation in PET/MRI with 4-Dimensional PET-Derived Deformation Matrices: Study of Feasibility for Lung Cancer Applications.
    Fayad H; Schmidt H; Küstner T; Visvikis D
    J Nucl Med; 2017 May; 58(5):833-839. PubMed ID: 27738008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of time-of-flight on indirect 3D and direct 4D parametric image reconstruction in the presence of inconsistent dynamic PET data.
    Kotasidis FA; Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3443-71. PubMed ID: 27049697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.