These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31389929)

  • 41. [Primary research on indoor air concentration of particulate matter in residential house and its relationship with ambient pollution level].
    Zhang Y; Li XY; Jiang LJ; Wei JR; Sheng X; Liu Y; Guo X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2005 Jul; 34(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 16229259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of response of real-time SidePak AM510 monitor to secondhand smoke, other common indoor aerosols, and outdoor aerosol.
    Jiang RT; Acevedo-Bolton V; Cheng KC; Klepeis NE; Ott WR; Hildemann LM
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1695-702. PubMed ID: 21589975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Five Years of Accurate PM
    Robinson DL; Goodman N; Vardoulakis S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 38063557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Control of wildfire-sourced PM2.5 in an office setting using a commercially available portable air cleaner.
    Stauffer DA; Autenrieth DA; Hart JF; Capoccia S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 Apr; 17(4):109-120. PubMed ID: 32160140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Differences in indoor versus outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles, PM2.5, PMabsorbance and NO2 in Swiss homes.
    Meier R; Eeftens M; Phuleria HC; Ineichen A; Corradi E; Davey M; Fierz M; Ducret-Stich RE; Aguilera I; Schindler C; Rochat T; Probst-Hensch N; Tsai MY; Künzli N
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2015; 25(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 25670021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Summary of PM
    Long RW; Urbanski SP; Lincoln E; Colón M; Kaushik S; Krug JD; Vanderpool RW; Landis MS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(4):295-312. PubMed ID: 36716322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of indoor and outdoor PM species at schools and residences in a high-altitude Ecuadorian urban center.
    Raysoni AU; Armijos RX; Weigel MM; Montoya T; Eschanique P; Racines M; Li WW
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Jul; 214():668-679. PubMed ID: 27149144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Can Public Spaces Effectively Be Used as Cleaner Indoor Air Shelters during Extreme Smoke Events?
    Wheeler AJ; Allen RW; Lawrence K; Roulston CT; Powell J; Williamson GJ; Jones PJ; Reisen F; Morgan GG; Johnston FH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Indoor PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations in primary schools in Sari, Iran.
    Mohammadyan M; Shabankhani B
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 24084345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
    DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating the feasibility of a personal particle exposure monitor in outdoor and indoor microenvironments in Shanghai, China.
    Wang K; Chen FE; Au W; Zhao Z; Xia ZL
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2019 Apr; 29(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30311769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of PM
    Du Y; Wang Q; Sun Q; Zhang T; Li T; Yan B
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Apr; 171():518-522. PubMed ID: 30641312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring during COVID-19 Lockdown.
    Kaliszewski M; Włodarski M; Młyńczak J; Kopczyński K
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33353048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Indoor-outdoor relationships of PM2.5 in four residential dwellings in winter in the Yangtze River Delta, China.
    Wang F; Meng D; Li X; Tan J
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Aug; 215():280-289. PubMed ID: 27213570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
    Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
    Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Performance assessment of NOVA SDS011 low-cost PM sensor in various microenvironments.
    Božilov A; Tasić V; Živković N; Lazović I; Blagojević M; Mišić N; Topalović D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):595. PubMed ID: 35857115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Composition of PM2.5 and PM1 on high and low pollution event days and its relation to indoor air quality in a home for the elderly.
    Buczyńska AJ; Krata A; Van Grieken R; Brown A; Polezer G; De Wael K; Potgieter-Vermaak S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():134-43. PubMed ID: 24852612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of a portable nephelometer against the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance method for monitoring PM(2.5).
    Karagulian F; Belis CA; Lagler F; Barbiere M; Gerboles M
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Aug; 14(8):2145-53. PubMed ID: 22766850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An inexpensive dual-chamber particle monitor: laboratory characterization.
    Edwards R; Smith KR; Kirby B; Allen T; Litton CD; Hering S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Jun; 56(6):789-99. PubMed ID: 16805403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modeling of residential indoor PM
    Du Y; Wang Y; Du Z; Zhang Y; Xu D; Li T
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():691-697. PubMed ID: 29621728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.