These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31390346)
1. Reconfigurable MRI coil technology can substantially reduce RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants: First in-vitro study of RF heating reduction in bilateral DBS leads at 1.5 T. Golestanirad L; Kazemivalipour E; Keil B; Downs S; Kirsch J; Elahi B; Pilitsis J; Wald LL PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220043. PubMed ID: 31390346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories. Kazemivalipour E; Keil B; Vali A; Rajan S; Elahi B; Atalar E; Wald LL; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():18-29. PubMed ID: 31096058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management. Golestanirad L; Kirsch J; Bonmassar G; Downs S; Elahi B; Martin A; Iacono MI; Angelone LM; Keil B; Wald LL; Pilitsis J Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():566-576. PubMed ID: 30243973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations. Kazemivalipour E; Vu J; Lin S; Bhusal B; Thanh Nguyen B; Kirsch J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():6143-6146. PubMed ID: 33019373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open-bore vertical MRI systems: A simulation study with realistic device configurations. Golestanirad L; Kazemivalipour E; Lampman D; Habara H; Atalar E; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Kirsch J Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jun; 83(6):2284-2292. PubMed ID: 31677308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems. Vu J; Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak P; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Golestanirad L PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278187. PubMed ID: 36490249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical Simulations of Realistic Lead Trajectories and an Experimental Verification Support the Efficacy of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission to Reduce Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants during MRI. McElcheran CE; Golestanirad L; Iacono MI; Wei PS; Yang B; Anderson KJT; Bonmassar G; Graham SJ Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2124. PubMed ID: 30765724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. Kazemivalipour E; Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Keil B; Eryaman Y; Atalar E; Golestanirad L PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280655. PubMed ID: 36701285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems. Kazemivalipour E; Bhusal B; Vu J; Lin S; Nguyen BT; Kirsch J; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1560-1572. PubMed ID: 33961301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation. Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow JM; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L J Neurosurg; 2024 May; 140(5):1459-1470. PubMed ID: 37948679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-Tesla MRI of deep brain stimulation patients: safety assessment of coils and pulse sequences. Boutet A; Hancu I; Saha U; Crawley A; Xu DS; Ranjan M; Hlasny E; Chen R; Foltz W; Sammartino F; Coblentz A; Kucharczyk W; Lozano AM J Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 132(2):586-594. PubMed ID: 30797197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T. Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak PP; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Lopez-Rosado R; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 32860322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants. Golestanirad L; Keil B; Angelone LM; Bonmassar G; Mareyam A; Wald LL Magn Reson Med; 2017 Apr; 77(4):1701-1712. PubMed ID: 27059266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission for the Reduction of Heating in Long Conductive Leads in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging. McElcheran CE; Yang B; Anderson KJ; Golenstani-Rad L; Graham SJ PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134379. PubMed ID: 26237218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient's body composition can significantly affect RF power deposition in the tissue around DBS implants: ramifications for lead management strategies and MRI field-shaping techniques. Bhusal B; Keil B; Rosenow J; Kazemivalipour E; Golestanirad L Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(1):015008. PubMed ID: 33238247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices. Kahan J; Papadaki A; White M; Mancini L; Yousry T; Zrinzo L; Limousin P; Hariz M; Foltynie T; Thornton J PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129077. PubMed ID: 26061738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants. Golestanirad L; Iacono MI; Keil B; Angelone LM; Bonmassar G; Fox MD; Herrington T; Adalsteinsson E; LaPierre C; Mareyam A; Wald LL Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():577-588. PubMed ID: 28011252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Accuracy of Numerical Simulations in Predicting Heating of Wire Implants During MRI at 1.5 T. Vu J; Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Golestanirad L Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():6107-6110. PubMed ID: 33019364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modifying surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation leads significantly reduces RF-induced heating during 3 T MRI. Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4978-4981. PubMed ID: 34892325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implants talk to each-other: RF heating changes when two DBS leads are present simultaneously during MRI. Bhusal B; Jiang F; Vu J; Sanpitak P; Golestanirad L Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38082747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]