These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31391040)
1. The Hermans-Rasson test as a powerful alternative to the Rayleigh test for circular statistics in biology. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP BMC Ecol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 31391040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circular data in biology: advice for effectively implementing statistical procedures. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2018; 72(8):128. PubMed ID: 30100666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grouped circular data in biology: advice for effectively implementing statistical procedures. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2020; 74(8):100. PubMed ID: 32728310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Biol Open; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32554482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consequences of grouped data for testing for departure from circular uniformity. Humphreys RK; Ruxton GD Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017; 71(11):167. PubMed ID: 29142337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the power of a recent method for comparing two circular distributions: an alternative to the Watson U Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP; Landler L Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10007. PubMed ID: 37340039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao's spacing test for non-continuous data. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Mov Ecol; 2019; 7():15. PubMed ID: 31110771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advice on comparing two independent samples of circular data in biology. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20337. PubMed ID: 34645855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The multivariate analysis of variance as a powerful approach for circular data. Landler L; Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP Mov Ecol; 2022 Apr; 10(1):21. PubMed ID: 35478074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bringing the analysis of animal orientation data full circle: model-based approaches with maximum likelihood. Fitak RR; Johnsen S J Exp Biol; 2017 Nov; 220(Pt 21):3878-3882. PubMed ID: 28860118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple permutation-type method for testing circular uniformity with correlated angular measurements. Follmann DA; Proschan MA Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):782-91. PubMed ID: 11315007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Lütkenhöner B Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():52-60. PubMed ID: 1814155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How well does the Rayleigh model describe the E-vector distribution of skylight in clear and cloudy conditions? A full-sky polarimetric study. Suhai B; Horváth G J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Sep; 21(9):1669-76. PubMed ID: 15384432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of Circular Statistics in the Presence of Measurement Bias. Alsammani A; Stacey WC; Gliske SV IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2024 Feb; 28(2):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 38032776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Rayleigh statistics of ultrasonic backscattered signals. Narayanan VM; Shankar PM; Reid JM IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1994; 41(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 18263274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing for departure from uniformity and estimating mean direction for circular data. Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2017 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28100719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating order-constrained hypotheses for circular data from a between-within subjects design. Baayen C; Klugkist I Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 25046448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies. Emily M; Friguet C Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2780-2799. PubMed ID: 26468267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials. Comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E; Wernecke KD Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8881009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multivariate generalized linear model for genetic pleiotropy. Schaid DJ; Tong X; Batzler A; Sinnwell JP; Qing J; Biernacka JM Biostatistics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):111-128. PubMed ID: 29267957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]