These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31391548)

  • 1. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labelled water.
    Burrows T; Goldman S; Rollo M
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2020 May; 74(5):669-681. PubMed ID: 31391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water.
    Burrows TL; Martin RJ; Collins CE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Oct; 110(10):1501-10. PubMed ID: 20869489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy Intake in Socially Vulnerable Women Living in Brazil: Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Methods of Dietary Intake Recording Using Doubly Labeled Water.
    Lins ILL; Bueno NB; Grotti Clemente AP; Pfrimer K; Sawaya AL; de Menezes Toledo Florêncio TM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Oct; 116(10):1560-1567. PubMed ID: 27083987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy intake in short bowel syndrome: assessment by 24-h dietary recalls compared with the doubly labelled water method.
    Fassini PG; Das SK; Pfrimer K; Suen VMM; Sérgio Marchini J; Ferriolli E
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Jan; 119(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29268807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.
    Börnhorst C; Bel-Serrat S; Pigeot I; Huybrechts I; Ottavaere C; Sioen I; De Henauw S; Mouratidou T; Mesana MI; Westerterp K; Bammann K; Lissner L; Eiben G; Pala V; Rayson M; Krogh V; Moreno LA;
    Clin Nutr; 2014 Feb; 33(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 23622780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Mobile Phone Based Method to Assess Energy and Food Intake in Young Children: A Validation Study against the Doubly Labelled Water Method and 24 h Dietary Recalls.
    Delisle Nyström C; Forsum E; Henriksson H; Trolle-Lagerros Y; Larsson C; Maddison R; Timpka T; Löf M
    Nutrients; 2016 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26784226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can a Web-based food record accurately assess energy intake in overweight and obese women? A pilot study.
    Hutchesson MJ; Truby H; Callister R; Morgan PJ; Davies PS; Collins CE
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2013 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():140-4. PubMed ID: 23495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An easy-to-use semiquantitative food record validated for energy intake by using doubly labelled water technique.
    Koebnick C; Wagner K; Thielecke F; Dieter G; Höhne A; Franke A; Garcia AL; Meyer H; Hoffmann I; Leitzmann P; Trippo U; Zunft HJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Sep; 59(9):989-95. PubMed ID: 16015274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of Energy Intake by a Food Frequency Questionnaire: Calibration and Validation with the Doubly Labeled Water Method in Japanese Older People.
    Watanabe D; Nanri H; Sagayama H; Yoshida T; Itoi A; Yamaguchi M; Yokoyama K; Watanabe Y; Goto C; Ebine N; Higaki Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Kimura M; Yamada Y;
    Nutrients; 2019 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 31323937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of Dietary Assessment Methods When Compared to the Method of Doubly Labeled Water: A Systematic Review in Adults.
    Burrows TL; Ho YY; Rollo ME; Collins CE
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():850. PubMed ID: 31920966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity of dietary assessment methods to accurately measure energy intake in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese: a systematic review.
    Walker JL; Ardouin S; Burrows T
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2018 Feb; 72(2):185-197. PubMed ID: 29259338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of total energy expenditure and energy intake in children aged 6-9 y.
    O'Connor J; Ball EJ; Steinbeck KS; Davies PS; Wishart C; Gaskin KJ; Baur LA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Nov; 74(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 11684533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of Dietary Assessment in Athletes: A Systematic Review.
    Capling L; Beck KL; Gifford JA; Slater G; Flood VM; O'Connor H
    Nutrients; 2017 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 29207495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of energy intake in women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a doubly labeled water method study.
    Farooqi N; Slinde F; Håglin L; Sandström T
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2015 May; 19(5):518-24. PubMed ID: 25923480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique.
    Hill RJ; Davies PS
    Br J Nutr; 2001 Apr; 85(4):415-30. PubMed ID: 11348556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wearable cameras can reduce dietary under-reporting: doubly labelled water validation of a camera-assisted 24 h recall.
    Gemming L; Rush E; Maddison R; Doherty A; Gant N; Utter J; Ni Mhurchu C
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Jan; 113(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25430667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements.
    Black AE; Bingham SA; Johansson G; Coward WA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 51(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 9192200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of dietary intakes measured by diet history against 24 h urinary nitrogen excretion and energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water method in middle-aged women.
    Black AE; Welch AA; Bingham SA
    Br J Nutr; 2000 Apr; 83(4):341-54. PubMed ID: 10858692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.