These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31391590)

  • 1. A resistance-sensing mechanical injector for the precise delivery of liquids to target tissue.
    Chitnis GD; Verma MKS; Lamazouade J; Gonzalez-Andrades M; Yang K; Dergham A; Jones PA; Mead BE; Cruzat A; Tong Z; Martyn K; Solanki A; Landon-Brace N; Karp JM
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2019 Aug; 3(8):621-631. PubMed ID: 31391590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A device for the spatio-regional delivery of a photocurable drug formulation.
    Sonoda H; Yasui H; Matsuda T
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jun; 25(14):2859-66. PubMed ID: 14962564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic behavior of a spring-powered micronozzle needle-free injector.
    Schoubben A; Cavicchi A; Barberini L; Faraon A; Berti M; Ricci M; Blasi P; Postrioti L
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Aug; 491(1-2):91-8. PubMed ID: 26027490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the biological performance of the needle-free injector INJEX using the isolated porcine forelimb.
    Wagner S; Dues G; Sawitzky D; Frey P; Christ B
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of Pyro-Drive Jet Injector With Controllable Jet Pressure.
    Miyazaki H; Atobe S; Suzuki T; Iga H; Terai K
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Jul; 108(7):2415-2420. PubMed ID: 30849461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delivery of immunoreactive antigen using a controllable needle-free jet injector.
    Hogan NC; Anahtar MN; Taberner AJ; Hunter IW
    J Control Release; 2017 Jul; 258():73-80. PubMed ID: 28479095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical immunogenicity of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine delivered by the Injex jet injector: comparison with standard syringe injection.
    Sarno MJ; Blase E; Galindo N; Ramirez R; Schirmer CL; Trujillo-Juarez DF
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2000 Sep; 19(9):839-42. PubMed ID: 11001106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In Vitro Simulation of Tissue Back-Pressure for Pen Injectors and Auto-Injectors.
    Yildiz A; Lenau TA
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Aug; 108(8):2685-2689. PubMed ID: 30959055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in syringe components and its impact on functionality of delivery systems.
    Rathore N; Pranay P; Eu B; Ji W; Walls E
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2011; 65(5):468-80. PubMed ID: 22293836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microneedle insertion force reduction using vibratory actuation.
    Yang M; Zahn JD
    Biomed Microdevices; 2004 Sep; 6(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 15377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical Note: Comparison of traditional needle vaccination with pneumatic, needle-free vaccination for sheep.
    Mousel MR; Leeds TD; White SN; Herrmann-Hoesing LM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1468-71. PubMed ID: 18310489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subcutaneous administration of midazolam: a comparison of the Bioject jet injector with the conventional syringe and needle.
    Bennett J; Nichols F; Rosenblum M; Condry J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 56(11):1249-54. PubMed ID: 9820211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of hypodermic needle dimensions on subcutaneous injection delivery--a pig study of injection deposition evaluated by CT scanning, histology, and backflow.
    Juul KA; Bengtsson H; Eyving B; Kildegaard J; Lav S; Poulsen M; Serup J; Stallknecht B
    Skin Res Technol; 2012 Nov; 18(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 22233448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prefilled syringe needles versus standard removable needles for intravitreous injection.
    Kozak I; Dean A; Clark TM; Falkenstein I; Freeman WR
    Retina; 2006; 26(6):679-83. PubMed ID: 16829812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infusion pump delivers over-dosage of propofol as a result of missing syringe support.
    Koch C; Hollister C; Breen PH
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Apr; 102(4):1154-6. PubMed ID: 16551915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of needle-assisted jet injections.
    Li X; Ruddy B; Taberner A
    J Control Release; 2016 Dec; 243():195-203. PubMed ID: 27746273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prestress as an optimal biomechanical parameter for needle penetration.
    Butz KD; Griebel AJ; Novak T; Harris K; Kornokovich A; Chiappetta MF; Neu CP
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1176-9. PubMed ID: 22381739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving needle-point sharpness in prefillable syringes.
    Vedrine L; Prais W; Laurent PE; Raynal-Olive C; Fantino M
    Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):32-5. PubMed ID: 12774577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sugar micro needles as transdermic drug delivery system.
    Miyano T; Tobinaga Y; Kanno T; Matsuzaki Y; Takeda H; Wakui M; Hanada K
    Biomed Microdevices; 2005 Sep; 7(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 16133805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.
    Hochman M; Chiarello D; Hochman CB; Lopatkin R; Pergola S
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(7):24-9. PubMed ID: 9297957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.