264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31392178)
41.
Dhananjaya KM; Vadavadagi SV; Almalki SA; Verma T; Arora S; Kumar NN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov; 20(11):1335-1338. PubMed ID: 31907340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs.
Uçtaşli MB; Bala O; Güllü A
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1197-202. PubMed ID: 15544656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surface Roughness, Microhardness, and Microleakage of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin after Immediate or Delayed Finishing/Polishing.
Lins FC; Ferreira RC; Silveira RR; Pereira CN; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS
Int J Dent; 2016; 2016():8346782. PubMed ID: 26977150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An
Ramírez-Vargas GG; Ladera-Castañeda MI; López-Gurreonero C; Cornejo-Pinto A; Cachay-Criado H; Cervantes-Ganoza LA; Cayo-Rojas CF
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2023; 13(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 37223443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Influence of Various Adhesive Systems and Polishing Methods on Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Evaluation.
Křivková T; Tichý A; Tycová H; Kučera J
Materials (Basel); 2023 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 37512378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins.
Moda MD; Godas AGL; Fernandes JC; Suzuki TYU; Guedes APA; Briso ALF; Bedran-Russo AK; Dos Santos PH
J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28762671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Usage of fiber-reinforced resin instruments in interproximal surfaces.
Can-Karabulut DC; Ozyurt P; Gurbuz A; Gullu A
Eur J Dent; 2008 Apr; 2(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19212518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW
J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites.
Patel B; Chhabra N; Jain D
J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 26957791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.
Aydın N; Topçu FT; Karaoğlanoğlu S; Oktay EA; Erdemir U
J Clin Exp Dent; 2021 May; 13(5):e446-e454. PubMed ID: 33981391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effects of polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of different composites.
Batista GR; Zanatta RF; Borges AB; Torres CRG
Gen Dent; 2021; 69(5):46-51. PubMed ID: 34424212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
Lu H; Roeder LB; Powers JM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(5):297-303; discussion 304. PubMed ID: 14620660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of Finishing and Polishing Methods on the Surface Roughness and Surface Free Energy of Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
Ishii R; Takamizawa T; Tsujimoto A; Suzuki S; Imai A; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E91-E104. PubMed ID: 31738697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Nanocomposites: Contact Profilometry and SEM Analyses.
Oglakci B; Kucukyildirim BO; Özduman ZC; Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic E
Oper Dent; 2021 Mar; 46(2):173-187. PubMed ID: 34192336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study.
Chour RG; Moda A; Arora A; Arafath MY; Shetty VK; Rishal Y
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Aug; 6(Suppl 2):S166-70. PubMed ID: 27652251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
