These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31392449)

  • 1. A Physiologically Inspired Model for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Chou KF; Dong J; Colburn HS; Sen K
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 20(6):579-593. PubMed ID: 31392449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biologically oriented algorithm for spatial sound segregation.
    Chou KF; Boyd AD; Best V; Colburn HS; Sen K
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1004071. PubMed ID: 36312015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Where is the cocktail party? Decoding locations of attended and unattended moving sound sources using EEG.
    Bednar A; Lalor EC
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116283. PubMed ID: 31629828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical Transformation of Spatial Processing for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem: A Computational Model(1,2,3).
    Dong J; Colburn HS; Sen K
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(1):. PubMed ID: 26866056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical Representations of Speech in a Multitalker Auditory Scene.
    Puvvada KC; Simon JZ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 37(38):9189-9196. PubMed ID: 28821680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
    Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.
    Litovsky RY; Gordon K
    Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 338():76-87. PubMed ID: 26828740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain correlates of the orientation of auditory spatial attention onto speaker location in a "cocktail-party" situation.
    Lewald J; Hanenberg C; Getzmann S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1484-95. PubMed ID: 27333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party".
    Kerlin JR; Shahin AJ; Miller LM
    J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(2):620-8. PubMed ID: 20071526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical Encoding of Attended Auditory Objects in Multi-talker Speech Perception.
    O'Sullivan J; Herrero J; Smith E; Schevon C; McKhann GM; Sheth SA; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Neuron; 2019 Dec; 104(6):1195-1209.e3. PubMed ID: 31648900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.