These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3139411)

  • 1. Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology.
    Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Uhde A; Aslaksen A
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug; 8(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 3139411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonography versus excretory urography: value in urological disease.
    Aslaksen A; Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug; 8(3):179-80. PubMed ID: 3139410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High and low osmolar contrast media: who pays?
    Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 May; 8(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 3383859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents.
    Bloom DM
    Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of production factors, costs, and process efficacy in the radiology department of a local health agency in Italy.
    Mecozzi B; Pancione L; De Intinis G; Gullstrand R; Gualtieri A; Giraudo P
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 12835645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bases for cost calculations in x-ray facilities].
    Bossard F
    Radiologe; 1985 Jun; 25(6):284-7. PubMed ID: 4023213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaking out: the new environment for radiology.
    Neuhauser D
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(3):16, 23. PubMed ID: 10310645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models for costing patient care services. Part 2: Costing organ imaging services.
    Gray PA; Abernethy MA; Stoelwinder JU
    Aust Health Rev; 1988; 11(2):98-109. PubMed ID: 10302920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost accounting of radiological examinations. Cost analysis of radiological examinations of intermediate referral hospitals and general practice.
    Lääperi AL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 407():1-54. PubMed ID: 8804226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiology services on a tight budget.
    MacEwan DW
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Jun; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7380875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DRG cost-per-case management. Cost-cutting drive tags imaging.
    Kuntz EF
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):150, 152. PubMed ID: 10310470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologic information management systems. System costs and savings.
    Choplin RH; Boehme JM; Park WC; Maynard CD; Williams RC
    Appl Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-9, 33. PubMed ID: 10286573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining costs in radiation therapy.
    Ibbott GS
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):30-4. PubMed ID: 10284736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost of imaging procedures.
    Foord KD
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):652-3. PubMed ID: 3044477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economics as an aid to decision making within diagnostic imaging departments.
    O'Shea E
    Radiography; 1987; 53(611):222-4. PubMed ID: 3120237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case study: cost/benefit analysis of clinical education--radiologic technology, College A-Hospital B.
    Pobojewski TR
    J Allied Health; 1978; 7(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 10308697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.