386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31395448)
1. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; De Benedictis A; Lanzotti A; Tribst JPM; Watts DC
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Apr; 24(5):485-495. PubMed ID: 33090047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Helal MA; Wang Z
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.
Gaintantzopoulou MD; Gopinath VK; Zinelis S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 27165307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
