130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31396856)
1. Optimizing image quality using automatic exposure control based on the signal-difference-to-noise ratio: a phantom study.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Hanaoka S; Matsubara K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):803-810. PubMed ID: 31396856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.
Favazza CP; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 25938214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for abdominal digital radiography: Evaluation using signal difference-to-noise ratio.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Nagasou D; Hattori M
Phys Med; 2017 Feb; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28148466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of automatic exposure control options in digital mammography.
Zhou Y; Scott A; Allahverdian J; Frankel S
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(3):377-94. PubMed ID: 24865213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.
Konst B; Weedon-Fekjaer H; Båth M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):151-159. PubMed ID: 31152576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations in signal-to-noise characteristics of tissue-equivalent attenuators for mammographic automatic exposure control system performance evaluation.
Morrison CK; Macdonald EB; Bevins NB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13870. PubMed ID: 36519622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3367-74. PubMed ID: 16370424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30508126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit.
Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Desmet W; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography.
Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of a spatio-temporal figure of merit for new automatic dose rate control regimes in dynamic x-ray imaging.
Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):045001. PubMed ID: 30630158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
