These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31396899)

  • 21. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra and AMBER OL3 and ROC-RNA Simulations of UCUCGU Reveal Force Field Strengths and Weaknesses for Single-Stranded RNA.
    Zhao J; Kennedy SD; Turner DH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Feb; 18(2):1241-1254. PubMed ID: 34990548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reoptimization of the AMBER force field parameters for peptide bond (Omega) torsions using accelerated molecular dynamics.
    Doshi U; Hamelberg D
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Dec; 113(52):16590-5. PubMed ID: 19938868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA.
    Galindo-Murillo R; Robertson JC; Zgarbová M; Šponer J; Otyepka M; Jurečka P; Cheatham TE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4114-27. PubMed ID: 27300587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adjusting the Energy Profile for CH-O Interactions Leads to Improved Stability of RNA Stem-Loop Structures in MD Simulations.
    Raguette LE; Gunasekera SS; Diaz Ventura RI; Aminov E; Linzer JT; Parwana D; Wu Q; Simmerling C; Nagan MC
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Aug; 128(33):7921-7933. PubMed ID: 39110091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Binding Thermodynamics and Interaction Patterns of Inhibitor-Major Urinary Protein-I Binding from Extensive Free-Energy Calculations: Benchmarking AMBER Force Fields.
    Huai Z; Shen Z; Sun Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):284-297. PubMed ID: 33307679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating RNA Secondary Structure Folding Free Energy Changes with efn2.
    Zuber J; Mathews DH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2726():1-13. PubMed ID: 38780725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Refining the RNA Force Field with Small-Angle X-ray Scattering of Helix-Junction-Helix RNA.
    He W; Naleem N; Kleiman D; Kirmizialtin S
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2022 Apr; 13(15):3400-3408. PubMed ID: 35404614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A coupled two-dimensional main chain torsional potential for protein dynamics: generation and implementation.
    Li Y; Gao Y; Zhang X; Wang X; Mou L; Duan L; He X; Mei Y; Zhang JZ
    J Mol Model; 2013 Sep; 19(9):3647-57. PubMed ID: 23765039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer Folding of RNA Tetraloops: Identification of Key Force Field Deficiencies.
    Kührová P; Best RB; Bottaro S; Bussi G; Šponer J; Otyepka M; Banáš P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Sep; 12(9):4534-48. PubMed ID: 27438572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protocols for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of RNA Nanostructures.
    Kim T; Kasprzak WK; Shapiro BA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1632():33-64. PubMed ID: 28730431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. RNA stability under different combinations of amber force fields and solvation models.
    Gong Z; Xiao Y; Xiao Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2010 Dec; 28(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 20919758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vfold2D-MC: A Physics-Based Hybrid Model for Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Folding.
    Cheng Y; Zhang S; Xu X; Chen SJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Sep; 125(36):10108-10118. PubMed ID: 34473508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correct folding of an α-helix and a β-hairpin using a polarized 2D torsional potential.
    Gao Y; Li Y; Mou L; Lin B; Zhang JZ; Mei Y
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():10359. PubMed ID: 26039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation and Comparison of Force Fields for Native Cyclodextrins in Aqueous Solution.
    Gebhardt J; Kleist C; Jakobtorweihen S; Hansen N
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Feb; 122(5):1608-1626. PubMed ID: 29287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.
    Hagler AT
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Feb; 33(2):205-264. PubMed ID: 30506159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of including torsional parameters for histidine-metal interactions in classical force fields for metalloproteins.
    Mera-Adasme R; Sadeghian K; Sundholm D; Ochsenfeld C
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Nov; 118(46):13106-11. PubMed ID: 25410708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fine-Tuning of the AMBER RNA Force Field with a New Term Adjusting Interactions of Terminal Nucleotides.
    Mlýnský V; Kührová P; Kühr T; Otyepka M; Bussi G; Banáš P; Šponer J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jun; 16(6):3936-3946. PubMed ID: 32384244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved Force Fields for Peptide Nucleic Acids with Optimized Backbone Torsion Parameters.
    Jasiński M; Feig M; Trylska J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jul; 14(7):3603-3620. PubMed ID: 29791152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of the free energy in a stochastic RNA secondary structure model.
    Nebel ME; Scheid A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(6):1468-82. PubMed ID: 21116040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improvements of the hierarchical approach for predicting RNA tertiary structure.
    Zhao Y; Gong Z; Xiao Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Apr; 28(5):815-26. PubMed ID: 21294592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.