These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31396906)

  • 1. Ligand-Binding Calculations with Metadynamics.
    Provasi D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():233-253. PubMed ID: 31396906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating drug-target association and dissociation mechanisms using metadynamics-based algorithms.
    Cavalli A; Spitaleri A; Saladino G; Gervasio FL
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 25496113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metadynamics to Enhance Sampling in Biomolecular Simulations.
    Pfaendtner J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():179-200. PubMed ID: 31396904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taming Rugged Free Energy Landscapes Using an Average Force.
    Fu H; Shao X; Cai W; Chipot C
    Acc Chem Res; 2019 Nov; 52(11):3254-3264. PubMed ID: 31680510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of Molecular Dynamics and Related Methods in Drug Discovery.
    De Vivo M; Masetti M; Bottegoni G; Cavalli A
    J Med Chem; 2016 May; 59(9):4035-61. PubMed ID: 26807648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using metadynamics and path collective variables to study ligand binding and induced conformational transitions.
    Bešker N; Gervasio FL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():501-13. PubMed ID: 22183554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerating the Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy and Residence Times Using Dynamically Optimized Collective Variables.
    Brotzakis ZF; Limongelli V; Parrinello M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):743-750. PubMed ID: 30537822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
    Chiu SH; Xie L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can One Trust Kinetic and Thermodynamic Observables from Biased Metadynamics Simulations?: Detailed Quantitative Benchmarks on Millimolar Drug Fragment Dissociation.
    Pramanik D; Smith Z; Kells A; Tiwary P
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 May; 123(17):3672-3678. PubMed ID: 30974941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular motions in drug design: the coming age of the metadynamics method.
    Biarnés X; Bongarzone S; Vargiu AV; Carloni P; Ruggerone P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 May; 25(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 21327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ligand diffusion in proteins via enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics.
    Rydzewski J; Nowak W
    Phys Life Rev; 2017 Dec; 22-23():58-74. PubMed ID: 28410930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alchemical free energy calculations via metadynamics: Application to the theophylline-RNA aptamer complex.
    Tanida Y; Matsuura A
    J Comput Chem; 2020 Jul; 41(20):1804-1819. PubMed ID: 32449538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced Molecular Dynamics Methods Applied to Drug Design Projects.
    Ziada S; Braka A; Diharce J; Aci-Sèche S; Bonnet P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():403-426. PubMed ID: 29594783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Integrated Markov State Model and Path Metadynamics Approach To Characterize Drug Binding Processes.
    Bernetti M; Masetti M; Recanatini M; Amaro RE; Cavalli A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Oct; 15(10):5689-5702. PubMed ID: 31436987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. tICA-Metadynamics for Identifying Slow Dynamics in Membrane Permeation.
    Oh M; da Hora GCA; Swanson JMJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Dec; 19(23):8886-8900. PubMed ID: 37943658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Metadynamics for the Elucidation of the Binding Modes and Free Energy Landscape of Drug/Target Interactions: a Case Study.
    Siddiqui GA; Stebani JA; Wragg D; Koutsourelakis PS; Casini A; Gagliardi A
    Chemistry; 2023 Nov; 29(62):e202302375. PubMed ID: 37555841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced sampling and free energy calculations for protein simulations.
    Liao Q
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2020; 170():177-213. PubMed ID: 32145945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.
    Decherchi S; Cavalli A
    Chem Rev; 2020 Dec; 120(23):12788-12833. PubMed ID: 33006893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.