150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31397413)
1. Comparison of WALA ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance.
Esteves T; Salvatore Freitas KM; Vaz de Lima D; Cotrin P; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; De Freitas MR; Gobbi de Oliveira RC
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31397413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17693371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.
Khattab TZ; Hajeer MY; Farah H; Al-Sabbagh R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 25707826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.
Rhoden FK; Maltagliati LÁ; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Filho LC; de Almeida Cardoso M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):623-9. PubMed ID: 27659077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary arch changes with transpalatal arch treatment followed by full fixed appliances.
Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 25286341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal class II malocclusions].
Wu J; Jiang J; Zou W; Xu T; Liu X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 24437297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental inclination with self-ligating and conventional fixed appliances, with and without rapid maxillary expansion.
Rengifo RM; Peña-Reyes D; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KMS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Janson G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30636098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions.
Ball RL; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20620832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
