435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31397522)
1. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation is associated with low contact force.
Tofig BJ; Lukac P; Borregaard R; Nielsen JM; Jensen HK; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Nielsen JC; Kristiansen SB
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2018 Feb; 52(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29191055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter.
Berte B; Hilfiker G; Russi I; Moccetti F; Cuculi F; Toggweiler S; Ruschitzka F; Kobza R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2199-2204. PubMed ID: 31424123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With or Without Contact Force Sensing.
Hussein AA; Barakat AF; Saliba WI; Tarakji KG; Bassiouny M; Baranowski B; Tchou P; Bhargava M; Dresing T; Callahan T; Cantillon D; Kanj M; Lindsay BD; Wazni OM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 28(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 28185351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lattice-Tip Focal Ablation Catheter That Toggles Between Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Energy to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Trial.
Reddy VY; Anter E; Rackauskas G; Peichl P; Koruth JS; Petru J; Funasako M; Minami K; Natale A; Jais P; Nakagawa H; Marinskis G; Aidietis A; Kautzner J; Neuzil P
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e008718. PubMed ID: 32383391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using a Circular Multipolar Ablation Catheter: Safety and Efficacy Using Low-Power Settings.
Burri H; Park CI; Poku N; Giraudet P; Stettler C; Zimmermann M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 26456225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Matsuda H; Parwani AS; Attanasio P; Huemer M; Wutzler A; Blaschke F; Haverkamp W; Boldt LH
Heart Vessels; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 26498938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters: Outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation.
Winkle RA; Mead RH; Engel G; Kong MH; Salcedo J; Brodt CR; Patrawala RA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 32272229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and long-term effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: real-world experience from a prospective, multicentre observational cohort registry.
De Potter T; Van Herendael H; Balasubramaniam R; Wright M; Agarwal SC; Sanders P; Khaykin Y; Latcu DG; Maury P; Pani A; Hayes J; Kalman J; Nery P; Duncan E
Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f410-f418. PubMed ID: 29315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mesh-type flexible tip catheter vs a contact force catheter for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A prospective nonrandomized 1:1 matched study.
Pak HN; Park JW; Yang SY; Yu HT; Uhm JS; Joung B; Lee MH; Kim TH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 32270578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced esophageal heating in high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation in the contact force catheter era.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Serpa E; Cunha CL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Amaral D; Lovatto C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 34081339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol.
Phlips T; Taghji P; El Haddad M; Wolf M; Knecht S; Vandekerckhove Y; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f419-f427. PubMed ID: 29315411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Chen CC; Lee PT; Van Ba V; Chuang CM; Lin YJ; Lo LW; Hu YF; Chung FP; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Liu CM; Wu CI; Lugtu IC; Jain A; Chang SL; Chen SA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Aug; 21(1):387. PubMed ID: 34372779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a second-generation cryoballoon catheter or contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter: A comparison of costs and long-term clinical outcomes.
Yokokawa M; Chugh A; Latchamsetty R; Ghanbari H; Crawford T; Jongnarangsin K; Cunnane R; Saeed M; Hornsby K; Krishnasamy K; Lohawijarn W; Keast R; Karpenko D; Bogun F; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 29071765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global multielectrode contact-mapping plus ablation with a single catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation: Global AF study.
Kottkamp H; Hindricks G; Pönisch C; Bertagnolli L; Moser F; Hilbert S; Rieger A; Sommer P
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 31512340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation.
Gunawardene MA; Hoffmann BA; Schaeffer B; Chung DU; Moser J; Akbulak RO; Jularic M; Eickholt C; Nuehrich J; Meyer C; Willems S
Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27742775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.
Winkle RA; Moskovitz R; Hardwin Mead R; Engel G; Kong MH; Fleming W; Salcedo J; Patrawala RA; Tranter JH; Shai I
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29460232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ablation index-guided 50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Procedural data, lesion analysis, and initial results from the FAFA AI High Power Study.
Chen S; Schmidt B; Bordignon S; Urbanek L; Tohoku S; Bologna F; Angelkov L; Garvanski I; Tsianakas N; Konstantinou A; Trolese L; Weise F; Perrotta L; Chun KRJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2724-2731. PubMed ID: 31588620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
