234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31397601)
1. Mapping the Peaks: Fitness Landscapes of the Fittest and the Flattest.
Franklin J; LaBar T; Adami C
Artif Life; 2019; 25(3):250-262. PubMed ID: 31397601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recombination and mutational robustness in neutral fitness landscapes.
Klug A; Park SC; Krug J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1006884. PubMed ID: 31415555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest.
Beardmore RE; Gudelj I; Lipson DA; Hurst LD
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7343):342-6. PubMed ID: 21441905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simple quasispecies models for the survival-of-the-flattest effect: The role of space.
Sardanyés J; Elena SF; Solé RV
J Theor Biol; 2008 Feb; 250(3):560-8. PubMed ID: 18054366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quasi-species evolution maximizes genotypic reproductive value (not fitness or flatness).
Smerlak M
J Theor Biol; 2021 Aug; 522():110699. PubMed ID: 33794289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of drift robustness in small populations.
LaBar T; Adami C
Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):1012. PubMed ID: 29044114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher-fitness yeast genotypes are less robust to deleterious mutations.
Johnson MS; Martsul A; Kryazhimskiy S; Desai MM
Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6464):490-493. PubMed ID: 31649199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of population size and mutation rate on the evolution of mutational robustness.
Elena SF; Wilke CO; Ofria C; Lenski RE
Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 17348929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest.
Wilke CO; Wang JL; Ofria C; Lenski RE; Adami C
Nature; 2001 Jul; 412(6844):331-3. PubMed ID: 11460163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of bacterial recombination on adaptation on fitness landscapes with limited peak accessibility.
Moradigaravand D; Engelstädter J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(10):e1002735. PubMed ID: 23133344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival of the steepest: hypersensitivity to mutations as an adaptation to soft selection.
Archetti M
J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):740-50. PubMed ID: 19243489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative Epistasis in Experimental RNA Fitness Landscapes.
Bendixsen DP; Østman B; Hayden EJ
J Mol Evol; 2017 Dec; 85(5-6):159-168. PubMed ID: 29127445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between the error catastrophe, survival of the flattest, and natural selection.
Tejero H; Marín A; Montero F
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 11():2. PubMed ID: 21205294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of mutational robustness in an RNA virus.
Montville R; Froissart R; Remold SK; Tenaillon O; Turner PE
PLoS Biol; 2005 Nov; 3(11):e381. PubMed ID: 16248678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness-epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein.
Bershtein S; Segal M; Bekerman R; Tokuriki N; Tawfik DS
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):929-32. PubMed ID: 17122770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond the Hypercube: Evolutionary Accessibility of Fitness Landscapes with Realistic Mutational Networks.
Zagorski M; Burda Z; Waclaw B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005218. PubMed ID: 27935934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferring the distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Böndel KB; Kraemer SA; Samuels T; McClean D; Lachapelle J; Ness RW; Colegrave N; Keightley PD
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000192. PubMed ID: 31242179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing Epistasis and Pleiotropy Can Avoid the Survival of the Flattest Tragedy.
Mehra P; Hintze A
Biology (Basel); 2024 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38534462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution at 'Sutures' and 'Centers': Recombination Can Aid Adaptation of Spatially Structured Populations on Rugged Fitness Landscapes.
Cooper JD; Kerr B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005247. PubMed ID: 27973606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of robustness on selection of a mutation-rate regulating gene.
Ancliff M; Park JM
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Sep; 84(3 Pt 1):031925. PubMed ID: 22060421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
