These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31397987)
1. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices. Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis. Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study. Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study. Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons. Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice. Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis. Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes. Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative. Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes? Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis. Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Maia RS; de Almeida Artifon EL; Otoch JP; Da Cruz JAS Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):37. PubMed ID: 38413490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction? Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. Schlager D; Hein S; Obaid MA; Wilhelm K; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 28844156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes. Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single use and disposable flexible ureteroscopes. Emiliani E; Traxer O Curr Opin Urol; 2017 Mar; 27(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 28027075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Evaluation of Longevity, the Factors that Affect it, and Damage Mechanisms. Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Zanetti SP; Catellani M; Oussoren HW; de la Rosette JJ Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 29534873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]