These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31398066)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients:
    Seiryu M; Ida H; Mayama A; Sasaki S; Sasaki S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Choi YK; Park JJ; Jeon HH; Kim YI
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 37272219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Dutta S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Talwar A; Arora A; Srivastava A
    Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 37084175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza RA; Rino Neto J; de Paiva JB
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 31475309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.
    Ge YS; Liu J; Chen L; Han JL; Guo X
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22639823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.
    Galeotti A; Martina S; Viarani V; Franchi L; Rongo R; D'Antò V; Festa P
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 43(3):274-282. PubMed ID: 33313718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
    Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].
    Shi H; Ge HS; Chen LY; Li ZH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 38(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 32037769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study.
    Rutili V; Souki BQ; Nieri M; Carlos ALFM; Pavoni C; Cozza P; McNamara JA; Giuntini V; Franchi L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jun; 27(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 38146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective long-term comparison of early RME-facemask versus late Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC and miniscrew-supported intraoral elastics in growing Class III patients.
    Papadopoulou AK; Koletsi D; Masucci C; Giuntini V; Franchi L; Darendeliler MA
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100603. PubMed ID: 34972642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
    Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal Class III cleft patients with or without bone graft.
    Zhang Y; Jia H; Fu Z; Huang Y; Wang Z; Guo R; Shen J; Li W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):542-549. PubMed ID: 29602346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal Effects of the Modified Tandem Appliance vs the Facemask Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Husson AH; Burhan AS; Salma FB; Nawaya FR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):522-9. PubMed ID: 27595716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid maxillary expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients: a retrospective follow-up study.
    Maino GB; Cremonini F; Maino G; Paoletto E; De Maio M; Spedicato GA; Palone M; Lombardo L
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):44. PubMed ID: 36178519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up.
    Anne Mandall N; Cousley R; DiBiase A; Dyer F; Littlewood S; Mattick R; Nute S; Doherty B; Stivaros N; McDowall R; Shargill I; Ahmad A; Walsh T; Worthington H
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 22984102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Liu Y; Hou R; Jin H; Zhang X; Wu Z; Li Z; Guo J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):321-332. PubMed ID: 33487499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.