BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31398253)

  • 1. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
    Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
    Paul RC; Fitzgerald O; Lieberman D; Venetis C; Chambers GM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety.
    Magnusson Å; Källen K; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jan; 33(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 29136154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old.
    Devesa M; Tur R; Rodríguez I; Coroleu B; Martínez F; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2010-2017. PubMed ID: 30272168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cycles.
    Malchau SS; Henningsen AA; Forman J; Loft A; Nyboe Andersen A; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):171-180. PubMed ID: 30541039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.
    Saket Z; Källén K; Lundin K; Magnusson Å; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(3):hoab021. PubMed ID: 34195386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
    Li Z; Wang AY; Bowman M; Hammarberg K; Farquhar C; Johnson L; Safi N; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection.
    Johnston M; Richings NM; Leung A; Sakkas D; Catt S
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 33367704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual Trigger for Final Follicular Maturation Improves Cumulative Live-Birth Rate in Ovarian Stimulation for Freeze-All
    Zhu H; Zhao C; Pan Y; Zhou H; Jin X; Xu W; Zhang S
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():708247. PubMed ID: 34349729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cumulative delivery rate per aspiration IVF/ICSI cycle in POSEIDON patients: a real-world evidence study of 9073 patients.
    Esteves SC; Yarali H; Vuong LN; Carvalho JF; Özbek İY; Polat M; Le HL; Pham TD; Ho TM; Humaidan P; Alviggi C
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2157-2169. PubMed ID: 34179973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cumulative live birth rates of 18 593 women with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation-related protocols and frozen-thawed transfer cycles.
    Nie Y; Guo W; Shen X; Xie Y; Zeng Y; Gao H; Liu Y; Wang L
    Hum Reprod Open; 2024; 2024(1):hoad051. PubMed ID: 38188854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parameters of poor prognosis in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.
    Van Der Kelen A; Santos-Ribeiro S; De Vos A; Verdyck P; De Rycke M; Berckmoes V; Tournaye H; Blockeel C; De Vos M; Hes FJ; Keymolen K; Verpoest W
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2558-2566. PubMed ID: 34142115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative live birth rates in low-prognosis women.
    Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Lambalk CB; de Bruin JP; Fleischer K; Mochtar MH; Kuchenbecker WKH; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Torrance HL; Broekmans FJM;
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 31125412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
    Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.
    Loreti S; Darici E; Nekkebroeck J; Drakopoulos P; Van Landuyt L; De Munck N; Tournaye H; De Vos M
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 38145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population trends and live birth rates associated with common ART treatment strategies.
    Chambers GM; Wand H; Macaldowie A; Chapman MG; Farquhar CM; Bowman M; Molloy D; Ledger W
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2632-2641. PubMed ID: 27664207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study.
    Lind T; Holte J; Olofsson JI; Hadziosmanovic N; Gudmundsson J; Nedstrand E; Lood M; Berglund L; Rodriguez-Wallberg K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 29211889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.
    Hipp HS; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 85.