151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31399056)
1. Investigating the feasibility of stratified breast cancer screening using a masking risk predictor.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Mainprize JG; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Aug; 21(1):91. PubMed ID: 31399056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.
Holland K; van Gils CH; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 28161786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
Destounis S; Johnston L; Highnam R; Arieno A; Morgan R; Chan A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 27824483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.
Kerlikowske K; Ma L; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM; Shepherd JA
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 28830497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.
Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Alshafeiy TI; Patrie JT; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):608-619. PubMed ID: 30100155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategies to Identify Women at High Risk of Advanced Breast Cancer During Routine Screening for Discussion of Supplemental Imaging.
Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Wernli KJ; Rauscher GH; Johnson D; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL
JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Sep; 179(9):1230-1239. PubMed ID: 31260054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Racial/ethnic differences in supplemental imaging for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts.
Ezratty C; Vang S; Brown J; Margolies LR; Jandorf L; Lin JJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 32394349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
