BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31399056)

  • 21. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
    Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?
    Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X;
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying masking in clinical mammograms via local detectability of simulated lesions.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1249-58. PubMed ID: 26936709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
    Sprague BL; Ichikawa L; Eavey J; Lowry KP; Rauscher G; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Chen S; Lee JM; Stout NK; Mandelblatt JS; Alsheik N; Herschorn SD; Perry H; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2456-2468. PubMed ID: 37303202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.
    Wang JM; Zhao HG; Liu TT; Wang FY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23112. PubMed ID: 33181680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
    Timmermans L; Bleyen L; Bacher K; Van Herck K; Lemmens K; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Martens P; De Brabander I; Goossens M; Thierens H
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3810-3819. PubMed ID: 28289944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast Density and Risk of Interval Cancers: The Effect of Annual Versus Biennial Screening Mammography Policies in Canada.
    Seely JM; Peddle SE; Yang H; Chiarelli AM; McCallum M; Narasimhan G; Zakaria D; Earle CC; Fung S; Bryant H; Nicholson E; Politis C; Berg WA
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34279132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
    Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
    Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
    Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.