These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3139955)

  • 1. Defining minors' abortion rights.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1988; 13(5):321. PubMed ID: 3139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consent requirements for treatment of minors.
    Thompson HA
    Tex Med; 1989 Aug; 85(8):56-9. PubMed ID: 2763219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connecticut's new abortion statute.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1990 Aug; 54(8):473. PubMed ID: 2225814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey.
    Siliciano JA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
    Belling DW; Eberl C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minors' rights win recognition (in sex-related health care).
    Pilpel HF; Paul EW
    PP News; 1978; 1(3):3. PubMed ID: 12309011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions.
    Henshaw SK; Kost K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):196-207, 213. PubMed ID: 1426181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parental notice and consent for abortion: out of step with family law principles and policies.
    Greenberger MD; Connor K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2029941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State regulation of abortion upon minors: the Supreme Court permits parental notification statutes.
    Harper LF
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Oct; 79(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 2230616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A technical knockout for parental notification.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3556537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right to abortion: the courts versus the legislatures.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1980 Jan; 54(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 6985600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.