These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31399606)
21. Environmental DNA sampling protocols for the surveillance of marine non-indigenous species in Irish coastal waters. Fernandez S; Miller DL; Holman LE; Gittenberger A; Ardura A; Rius M; Mirimin L Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Nov; 172():112893. PubMed ID: 34464822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition. Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. McClenaghan B; Fahner N; Cote D; Chawarski J; McCarthy A; Rajabi H; Singer G; Hajibabaei M PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0236540. PubMed ID: 33147221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of fish biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Ahn H; Kume M; Terashima Y; Ye F; Kameyama S; Miya M; Yamashita Y; Kasai A PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0231127. PubMed ID: 33022692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Mariani S; Baillie C; Colosimo G; Riesgo A Curr Biol; 2019 Jun; 29(11):R401-R402. PubMed ID: 31163139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA in a bottle-Rapid metabarcoding survey for early alerts of invasive species in ports. Borrell YJ; Miralles L; Do Huu H; Mohammed-Geba K; Garcia-Vazquez E PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183347. PubMed ID: 28873426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. eDNA metabarcoding: a promising method for anuran surveys in highly diverse tropical forests. Lopes CM; Sasso T; Valentini A; Dejean T; Martins M; Zamudio KR; Haddad CFB Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):904-914. PubMed ID: 27987263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea. Yamamoto S; Masuda R; Sato Y; Sado T; Araki H; Kondoh M; Minamoto T; Miya M Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40368. PubMed ID: 28079122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Seasonal dynamics of riverine fish communities using eDNA. Milhau T; Valentini A; Poulet N; Roset N; Jean P; Gaboriaud C; Dejean T J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):387-398. PubMed ID: 31674010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Illumina iSeq 100 and MiSeq exhibit similar performance in freshwater fish environmental DNA metabarcoding. Nakao R; Inui R; Akamatsu Y; Goto M; Doi H; Matsuoka S Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15763. PubMed ID: 34344957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction. Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monitoring freshwater fish communities in large rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a long-term electrofishing survey. Goutte A; Molbert N; Guérin S; Richoux R; Rocher V J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 32412670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring. Couton M; Lévêque L; Daguin-Thiébaut C; Comtet T; Viard F Biofouling; 2022 Apr; 38(4):367-383. PubMed ID: 35575060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring. Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries. Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats. Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Responses of foraminifera communities to aquaculture-derived organic enrichment as revealed by environmental DNA metabarcoding. He X; Sutherland TF; Pawlowski J; Abbott CL Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(5):1138-1153. PubMed ID: 30614581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]