These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31399994)

  • 1. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Noma H; Hamura Y; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):731-741. PubMed ID: 37399845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unified method for improved inference in random effects meta-analysis.
    Sugasawa S; Noma H
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 31215617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact two-sample inference with missing data.
    Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):524-31. PubMed ID: 16011700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
    Kojima M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
    Jackson D
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
    Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Gosho M; Ishii R; Oba K; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):891-902. PubMed ID: 32921002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A refined method for multivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Jackson D; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 23996351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Manning AK; Dupuis J
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1278-84. PubMed ID: 22551393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.