These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31399994)

  • 21. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
    Jackson D; Bowden J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Random-effects meta-analysis of combined outcomes based on reconstructions of individual patient data.
    Song Y; Sun F; Redline S; Wang R
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):594-616. PubMed ID: 32270909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robust inference methods for meta-analysis involving influential outlying studies.
    Noma H; Sugasawa S; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2024 Sep; 43(20):3778-3791. PubMed ID: 38899515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical inference for extended or shortened phase II studies based on Simon's two-stage designs.
    Zhao J; Yu M; Feng XP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():48. PubMed ID: 26048655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An alternative pseudolikelihood method for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis.
    Chen Y; Hong C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 25363629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.
    Ju C; Benkeser D; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 31350906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Confidence intervals for the mean of lognormal data with excess zeros.
    Tian L; Wu J
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 16544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved inference for fixed-effects meta-analysis of 2 × 2 tables.
    Qijun Li K; Rice K
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 32092228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis.
    Biggerstaff BJ; Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6093-110. PubMed ID: 18781561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta-analyses.
    Chen Y; Cai Y; Hong C; Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1405-22. PubMed ID: 26537017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A population-averaged approach to diagnostic test meta-analysis.
    Preisser JS; Inan G; Powers JM; Chu H
    Biom J; 2019 Jan; 61(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30370548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events.
    Jiang T; Cao B; Shan G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32349702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlated bivariate continuous and binary outcomes: issues and applications.
    Teixeira-Pinto A; Normand SL
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(13):1753-73. PubMed ID: 19358234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis.
    Follmann DA; Proschan MA
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):732-7. PubMed ID: 11315000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests.
    Simoneau G; Levis B; Cuijpers P; Ioannidis JPA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Bombardier CH; de Lima Osório F; Fann JR; Gjerdingen D; Lamers F; Lotrakul M; Löwe B; Shaaban J; Stafford L; van Weert HCPM; Whooley MA; Wittkampf KA; Yeung AS; Thombs BD; Benedetti A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1317-1338. PubMed ID: 28692782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.